"Nobody Cares About Epstein": Donald Trump’s Callous Words and the Haunting Cost of Indifference

In my article, I deliberately included the references to “Christine Blasey Ford” and “Trump unleashed a barrage of conspiracy-laced grievances.” Why did I do that? Because Trump said:

“Let’s keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein.”

as if pursuing justice for victims is somehow a waste of time! but his pursue of justice for himself is justified? Double standard!

Also, why is Donald J. Trump so fixated on Rosie O'Donnell, spending years attacking her in interviews, speeches, and tweets yet he tells the public not to waste time on Epstein? He’s wasted plenty of energy on Rosie. But when it comes to sexual abuse victims and accountability for an elite predator, suddenly he wants us all to move on?

On July 12, 2025, at 5:21 PM EST, former President Donald J. Trump took to his social media platform Truth Social and wrote a sentence that should chill any person with a shred of humanity left:

“Let’s keep it that way, and not waste Time and Energy on Jeffrey Epstein, somebody that nobody cares about.”

This is not a misquote. These are the exact words of a man who holds the highest office in the land and who is now attempting to silence victims. In a post defending Attorney General Pam Bondi, Trump unleashed a barrage of conspiracy-laced grievances against his usual enemies (Obama, Clinton, Comey, Brennan, Biden, and “51 Intelligence Agents”), before arriving at what he framed as the real distraction: the persistent demands for justice surrounding Jeffrey Epstein.

Let us not forget: Epstein was a convicted sex offender. He ran a documented and deeply disturbing international sex trafficking ring, exploiting underage girls and allegedly enabling his powerful friends to do the same. These girls now grown women have spent years reliving the trauma, fighting to be heard, and begging for transparency and accountability.

And yet here we are: the man who wants to “Make America Great Again” telling the public not to waste time on Epstein, because, in his words, “nobody cares.”

That line “nobody cares about Epstein” is more than offensive. It’s morally bankrupt. It spits in the face of survivors. It diminishes the efforts of investigative journalists, attorneys, law enforcement officers, and victims’ rights advocates who have fought to keep Epstein’s crimes and his powerful enablers in the public eye.

But let’s be brutally honest: this statement is not just tone-deaf. It’s dangerous.

The Consequences of Indifference

Trump’s declaration is the culmination of a pattern. It’s the same attitude that dismissed the "Access Hollywood" tape as locker-room talk. The same attitude that undermined Christine Blasey Ford. The same attitude that repeatedly demonizes whistleblowers, journalists, and women brave enough to speak out.

What happens when the most powerful voices in America tell you justice doesn’t matter?

• Victims go silent. 
• Investigations stall. 
• Evidence gets buried. 
• Accountability dies.

And worst of all, abusers learn they are untouchable.

Real People, Real Pain

Epstein’s victims are not political pawns. They are survivors many of whom were just children when the abuse began. Their testimonies paint a grotesque picture of coercion, grooming, rape, and psychological manipulation. Many suffer from lifelong PTSD, anxiety, addiction, and depression. Their lives were fractured by Epstein and, allegedly, the elite social web he operated within.

When Trump scoffs at their pursuit of justice, calling it a “waste,” he is aiding and abetting the cultural rot that allowed Epstein to thrive for so long.

The Truth Behind the Files

Trump frames the Epstein files as some sort of partisan hoax: “Files written by Obama, Crooked Hillary, Comey, Brennan, and the Losers and Criminals of the Biden Administration…” But these documents weren’t manufactured by Democrats. They’re court records, grand jury transcripts, legal filings, survivor testimony, flight logs, and photo evidence pieces of a horrifying mosaic that continues to grow.

His question "Why didn’t these Radical Left Lunatics release the Epstein Files?" has an obvious answer: much of the material has been released, and more continues to surface. The real question is: Why are people still trying to suppress it?

The Political Cost?

Trump won’t lose his core base over this post. The cult of personality surrounding him is nearly impervious to scandal. But what about moderate Republicans, suburban women, and independents? What about voters with daughters? With hearts?

The erosion is already happening. Slowly. Quietly. Each outrageous statement leaves a mark. And this one may be the deepest yet.

Because when a former president tells the world that victims of sex trafficking don’t matter when he implies that uncovering crimes against minors is a distraction he’s no longer just politically controversial. He’s morally complicit.

And America deserves better.

Let us remember the names of the victims. Let us honor their stories. Let us care.

Even if Donald J. Trump thinks nobody does.

T.H. Chan School of Public Health’s Disgraceful Failures: Antisemitism, Student Harm, and CCP Collusion Under Justified Federal Scrutiny

From Prestigious Institution to Pariah: How HSPH’s Antisemitic Culture and CCP Ties Betrayed Students

Harvard University, once a beacon of academic excellence, has transformed its T.H. Chan School of Public Health (HSPH) into a hotbed of chaos and disruption, fostering a toxic environment of antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias that has justifiably drawn the full weight of federal scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, and Congress. The university’s egregious failures, as detailed in the Final Report of the Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias released on April 29, 2025, reveal a shameful betrayal of its students, particularly Jewish and Israeli affiliates, who endured a living hell of discrimination, harassment, and institutional neglect. Harvard’s complicity in allowing faculty and programs to perpetuate hate, coupled with its unethical collaboration with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), warrants not only the government’s aggressive interventions but also civil rights lawsuits from students for the profound harm inflicted. Every available law should be leveraged to hold Harvard accountable, and affected students deserve compensation for the university’s gross violations of their rights.

The 321-page report explicitly identifies HSPH as a primary site of antisemitism, with Harvard acknowledging on page 8 that the school’s leadership inherited significant challenges during the 2023-24 decanal transition, underscoring its problematic practices. HSPH’s collaboration with the CCP’s Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) a sanctioned entity complicit in the Uyghur genocide further stains its reputation, intensifying federal investigations and a $2 billion funding freeze by the Trump administration. This article examines HSPH’s shameful treatment of students, its problematic practices as acknowledged by Harvard, the CCP’s corrosive influence, and the justified government response, alongside financial context.

Harvard’s Ties to the CCP and Why the U.S. Government Is Cracking Down

 

Uncovering the Controversy Behind Harvard’s Chinese Connections and DHS’s Unprecedented Action

Harvard University, one of the world’s most prestigious schools, is under fire for its connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), particularly a group called the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC). This controversy has led to a shocking decision by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke Harvard’s ability to enroll new international students starting in the 2025-2026 academic year. In this article, we’ll break down what’s happening in simple terms, explain the allegations about Harvard’s ties to the CCP, and clarify why DHS is taking such a drastic step. We’ll also look at whether students are directly involved and what this means for Harvard’s future.

What’s the Issue with Harvard and the CCP?

Harvard has been accused of working with the XPCC, a CCP-controlled paramilitary group tied to serious human rights abuses in China’s Xinjiang region. The XPCC is involved in the Uyghur genocide, where millions of Uyghur Muslims have faced forced labor, mass detention, and cultural erasure. In 2020, the U.S. government sanctioned the XPCC under the Global Magnitsky Act, banning American institutions from doing business with it.

Despite these sanctions, Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health reportedly hosted training programs for XPCC officials in 2019, 2023, and as recently as 2024. These programs, part of the China Health Partnership, were designed to teach Chinese officials about healthcare systems, like how to set up insurance programs. The problem? Some of the participants were from the XPCC, a group the U.S. considers a major human rights violator. Critics argue that Harvard’s actions not only broke U.S. sanctions but also gave legitimacy to a group responsible for atrocities.

Beyond the XPCC, Harvard has broader ties to China that raise eyebrows. Since 2012, the university has received over $1.1 billion in foreign funding, with a significant chunk coming from Chinese sources, including $151 million from foreign governments since 2020. Harvard has also partnered with Chinese universities like Tsinghua and Zhejiang, which are linked to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), China’s military. Some of these collaborations, oddly enough, were even funded by the U.S. Department of Defense, raising concerns about whether Harvard’s research could be helping China’s military.

Kristi Noem’s Capital Burger Blunder: DHS Diva’s Purse Plucked in Pickle-Powered Pilfering

 

Kristi Noem

Thief Swipes $3,000, Badge, and Kristi’s Crime-Busting Mojo Mid-Milkshake at Capital Burger

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s Purse Stolen from D.C. Restaurant

Thief Snags $3,000 Cash, Sensitive Documents in Bold Heist at Capital Burger

On the evening of Sunday, April 20, 2025, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem became the victim of a brazen theft while dining at the Capital Burger restaurant in downtown Washington, D.C. The incident, which saw a thief make off with Noem’s purse containing approximately $3,000 in cash and several sensitive items, has sparked questions about personal security, situational awareness, and the safety of high-profile officials in the nation’s capital. The Secret Service, responsible for Noem’s protection, is actively investigating the theft, which was captured on security footage.

The Incident: A Quick and Calculated Theft

According to multiple reports, Noem was dining with her family at the Capital Burger when the theft occurred. A law enforcement source revealed that security camera footage showed an unknown white male wearing a medical mask swiftly stealing Noem’s purse before exiting the restaurant. The suspect’s use of a mask has complicated identification efforts, and no additional details about his identity have been released as of April 21, 2025.

Noem initially mistook the theft for her grandchild brushing against her leg, only realizing moments later that her purse was gone, according to a person familiar with the incident. This brief distraction underscores the thief’s opportunism, as the act took place in close proximity to Noem’s Secret Service detail, raising questions about the effectiveness of her security at that moment.

The stolen purse contained a trove of valuable and sensitive items, including:

• Approximately $3,000 in cash
• Noem’s passport
• Driver’s license
• DHS access badge
• Apartment keys
• Prescription medication
• Makeup bag
• Blank checks

The DHS explained that Noem was carrying the large sum of cash to treat her family, including her children and grandchildren, to dinner, Easter activities, and gifts, as they were all in town for the holiday weekend. While this explanation has been widely reported, it has also drawn scrutiny, with some questioning the wisdom of carrying such a significant amount of cash and sensitive documents in a public setting.

The Aftermath: Investigation and Public Reaction

The Secret Service has launched an investigation, focusing on tracing any use of Noem’s financial instruments, such as the blank checks, and reviewing additional evidence to identify the suspect. The theft of a DHS access badge is particularly concerning, as it could potentially compromise security at DHS facilities, though no reports have indicated misuse of the badge thus far.

Noem publicly acknowledged the incident on Monday, April 21, 2025, during an appearance at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She noted that the matter remains unresolved, but she refrained from providing further details, deferring to the ongoing investigation.

Public reaction, particularly on platforms like X, has been a mix of incredulity, criticism, and humor. Some users questioned how the head of Homeland Security could fall victim to a common theft, with one post stating, “How can she keep the homeland secure when she can’t even keep her purse secure??” Others speculated about the competence of her Secret Service detail, with comments like, “If the purse was near her, the Secret Service weren’t very attentive, were they?” Meanwhile, critics highlighted the irony of Noem’s recent remarks about gang activity, pointing out that she had previously flagged a suspect carrying $1,000 as evidence of criminal behavior, yet she herself was carrying three times that amount.

On Reddit, discussions ranged from sarcastic jabs about Noem’s “30-pound makeup bag” to more serious concerns about the potential compromise of sensitive information, with one user noting, “Less about the money and more about the potentially sensitive information/access to sensitive information on any devices in the bag.” Some even speculated, without evidence, about the possibility of the theft being a targeted act, though authorities have not suggested this was anything other than a random crime.

Context: Crime in D.C. and Noem’s Role

The theft comes at a time when crime in Washington, D.C., remains a significant issue, though violent crime reportedly hit a 30-year low in 2024, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office. Property crimes, such as theft, continue to plague the city, and Noem’s experience underscores the vulnerability even high-profile individuals face in public spaces.

As DHS Secretary, Noem oversees critical national security functions, including border control, immigration, counterterrorism, and cybersecurity. Her department also includes agencies like the Secret Service, which is now tasked with investigating the very incident that occurred under its watch. The optics of the situation are challenging for Noem, who has positioned herself as a tough-on-crime figure. Critics, including some on X, have seized on the incident to question her competence, with one user quipping, “She can’t even handle being the Handbag Security Secretary, and people think she can be the Homeland Security Secretary.”

Broader Implications

The theft raises several broader questions. First, it highlights the risks of carrying large sums of cash and sensitive items, particularly for someone in Noem’s position. While DHS has defended her actions, the decision to carry $3,000 in cash, a passport, and a DHS badge in a single purse has been called “plain stupid” by some, including a self-professed Noem supporter on a Free Republic forum.

Second, the incident exposes potential gaps in the security protocols for high-ranking officials. Noem’s Secret Service detail, while present, was unable to prevent the theft, prompting speculation about whether the purse was left unattended or if the detail was momentarily distracted. This has fueled online debates about the adequacy of her protection, with one X user asking, “Where’s her Sherlock Holmes costume?”

Finally, the loss of a DHS access badge and blank checks could have security implications, though the Secret Service’s proactive monitoring of Noem’s financial accounts may mitigate some risks. The incident serves as a reminder of the need for heightened vigilance, even for those tasked with protecting the nation.

Conclusion

The theft of Kristi Noem’s purse at a Washington, D.C., restaurant is more than a personal misfortune; it’s a public relations challenge for a DHS Secretary already under scrutiny for her high-profile role. While the $3,000 in cash has drawn headlines, the theft of sensitive items like a DHS badge and passport underscores the potential gravity of the incident. As the Secret Service continues its investigation, Noem faces the task of reassuring the public that she can secure the homeland, even as critics question her ability to secure her own belongings. For now, the unknown thief remains at large, leaving Noem—and the nation—awaiting answers in a city where even the head of Homeland Security isn’t immune to crime.