Showing posts with label Global News. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Global News. Show all posts

Monday, March 30, 2026

UN’s Secret Sharia Takeover: Islamic Philanthropy Fund Turns Migration Aid Into Faith-Based Weapon

 

UN’s Secret Sharia Takeover


UN’s Secret Sharia Takeover: Islamic Philanthropy Fund Turns Migration Aid Into Faith-Based Weapon



A bombshell thread by genocide scholar Leslie Kajomovitz (@kikas6652) is blowing the lid off a disturbing new UN program that could rewrite the rules of global migration aid forever.
In a detailed X thread posted March 29, 2026 (read it here: https://x.com/kikas6652/status/2038316675976798359), Kajomovitz exposes how the UN’s International Organization for Migration (IOM) has quietly launched the Islamic Philanthropy Fund (IPF). This isn’t ordinary charity. It’s a full-blown system that embeds Zakat (mandatory Islamic almsgiving) and Sadaqah (voluntary charity) directly into UN operations, complete with Sharia law compliance, fatwas from Islamic clerics, and an advisory board to keep everything “halal.”
Here’s the chilling part: Zakat isn’t neutral “help anyone in need” aid. Under classical Islamic rules, it prioritizes Muslims and specific religious categories, including those “fighting in the cause of Allah.” That directly clashes with every UN principle of impartial, needs-based humanitarian work.
Kajomovitz calls it exactly what it looks like: a parallel faith-based governance structure inside a major UN agency.And the money is already flowing. In just 18 months, over $24 million has poured through the IPF, including $1 million deals with charities that have faced serious scrutiny for weak oversight and potential diversion risks.
The biggest red flag? IOM’s close partnership with Islamic Relief Worldwide (IRW) a massive Muslim NGO operating in 40+ countries. IRW has been banned by Israel (over alleged Hamas ties), labeled a terrorist-linked group by the UAE, had bank accounts shut down by UBS and HSBC over counter-terror fears, and drawn warnings from Sweden, Germany, the Netherlands, the U.S., and Bangladesh for radicalization risks and Muslim Brotherhood connections. Even IRW’s own U.S. branch sued the parent organization over the reputational damage.

Meanwhile, the same IOM largely bankrolled by Western taxpayers (U.S., EU, UK, Canada, Japan) is running massive logistics operations that critics say actively facilitate irregular migration into those very countries. Think cash cards, debit vouchers, and transit support in Libya, Niger, the Western Balkans, and even the Calais migrant camps. Its 2024 budget hit $3.7 billion, with the U.S. alone kicking in over $1.4 billion.

Kajomovitz doesn’t mince words: “The IOM is a convergence of illegal migration and ideology… The UN dumped international law for Sharia law.” This isn’t conspiracy it’s documented in IOM’s own materials, job postings for “Islamic Philanthropy Officer” roles, and fatwa endorsements from groups like the International Islamic Fiqh Academy and International Union of Muslim Scholars.
The thread also notes growing ties with Qatar, which has poured hundreds of thousands into IOM with few strings attached.

Bottom line: While Western governments fund the UN to “manage” migration, a parallel Sharia-compliant system is being built inside the same agency using religious doctrine to steer aid and influence. Kajomovitz’s full analysis is on her Substack, but the X thread alone should set off every alarm bell.

If this doesn’t scream “time to demand full transparency and accountability from the UN,” nothing does. Share this, read the thread, and ask your elected officials: Why are our tax dollars building a Sharia migration machine?






at No comments:
Labels: , ,

Friday, January 16, 2026

When Bad Data Becomes a Weapon: How Data Broker Misinformation Fuels Workplace Mobbing - Opt-Out.

 


Employees silently suffer as inaccurate records follow them into the workplace, amplifying harassment, bias, and trauma.




Workplace mobbing rarely begins inside a conference room. In many modern cases, it starts far earlier, inside opaque data systems employees never see, cannot access easily, and are powerless to correct in time.

Large employers increasingly rely on third-party data brokers to inform hiring, screening, risk assessments, and internal investigations. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, the largest data broker in the United States under parent company RELX Group, maintains tens of billions of records containing employment history, identity data, family associations, alleged criminal links, and risk indicators. When that information is wrong, the damage does not stay confined to databases. It follows employees directly into the workplace.

Wrong data does not remain neutral. It reshapes how an employee is perceived, treated, and targeted.

From Data Error to Workplace Target

Misinformation inside data broker systems can falsely link an employee to criminal records, deceased individuals, unrelated family members, or fabricated risk profiles. Once such errors flow into employer systems, insurance assessments, compliance reviews, or background screening tools, the employee often becomes marked as “problematic” without explanation.

Colleagues may receive quiet warnings. Supervisors may increase scrutiny. HR may document concerns without sharing underlying sources. Rumors begin to circulate. Isolation follows. Performance is questioned. Opportunities disappear.

What appears externally as “interpersonal conflict” is often coordinated harassment rooted in a false data narrative. Workplace mobbing thrives when misinformation provides perceived justification.

Mobbing Amplified by Presumed Guilt

Workplace mobbing involves persistent harassment, exclusion, sabotage, rumor campaigns, and psychological pressure. Research links mobbing to depression, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. In clinical samples, more than 70 percent of mobbing victims met diagnostic criteria for PTSD.

When data broker misinformation exists, mobbing escalates faster and becomes harder to challenge. Leadership assumes data equals truth. Employees are forced to defend themselves against invisible accusations. Reporting becomes dangerous when the system already labels the target as high-risk or unreliable.

Presumed guilt replaces due process.

Corporate Convenience, Human Cost

LexisNexis has paid millions of dollars in settlements over inaccurate reporting, including a $13.5 million settlement tied to false “deceased” designations that disrupted employment, insurance, and credit access. Such settlements represent systemic failure, not isolated incidents.

Despite repeated legal actions, federal oversight of data brokers remains minimal. No licensing regime exists. No strict accuracy enforcement exists. No meaningful opt-out exists. Errors are treated as acceptable collateral damage.

For employees, consequences are severe:

  • Quiet removal from promotion or leadership tracks

  • Heightened surveillance or disciplinary actions

  • Psychological injury from sustained mobbing

  • Career derailment without formal allegations

  • Long-term reputational harm that follows across employers

All while corporations benefit from speed, automation, and plausible deniability.

Organizational Complicity

When employers rely on third-party data without verification, leadership becomes complicit in harm. Silence from management signals endorsement. Policies without transparency provide no protection. HR processes that conceal data sources eliminate any chance of defense.

Organizations that permit mobbing fueled by unverified data transform into systems of psychological injury rather than workplaces of integrity.

Legal risk increases alongside moral failure. Employers inherit liability when data errors drive discriminatory treatment, retaliation, or constructive dismissal.

Protecting Employees in a Data-Driven Workplace

Employees facing mobbing linked to misinformation are not powerless, though the burden is unjustly heavy.

Key protections include:

  • Requesting and reviewing personal data held by brokers such as LexisNexis

  • Disputing inaccuracies in writing and retaining documentation

  • Consulting employment counsel before internal escalation

  • Understanding anti-retaliation protections under employment and civil rights laws

  • Documenting patterns that demonstrate coordinated harassment

Legal consultation empowers employees without requiring immediate action.

Accountability Must Replace Silence

Bad data does not remain theoretical. It inflicts real psychological trauma, fuels mob stalking dynamics, and destroys livelihoods. Eighty billion records later, data accuracy is no longer a privacy issue alone. It is a workplace safety issue. It is a mental health issue. It is a leadership issue.

Standing up for employees harmed by misinformation requires confronting uncomfortable truths about data brokers, corporate reliance on flawed systems, and institutional silence.

Workers deserve dignity, transparency, and protection from harm generated by invisible databases they never consented to enter.

Silence enables abuse. Accountability restores humanity.


Protect yourself: LexisNexis Opt-Out Form - https://optout.lexisnexis.com


Sources:


at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , , ,

Thursday, January 15, 2026

Eighty Billion Records Later: How LexisNexis Turned American Privacy Into Collateral Damage

 

wikipedia - LexisNexis



How America’s Largest Data Broker Profits From Inaccuracy, Political Influence, and Regulatory Failure While Consumers Absorb the Damage






In 2021, a warning went out to consumers: personal data had become a commodity, traded at industrial scale, with ordinary Americans bearing all the risk and none of the control. Four years later, conditions have deteriorated. The scale has grown, the errors persist, and accountability remains elusive. The largest data broker in the country, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, operating under its parent company RELX Group, continues to warehouse, monetize, and distribute deeply sensitive personal information on millions of people, often inaccurately, often without consent, and frequently with documented harm.

The core issue has never changed. Consumers are exposed to serious risk by data brokers, and no meaningful federal protection exists to stop it.

The Reality of Data Brokerage in America

LexisNexis maintains and sells access to databases containing tens of billions of records. Those records include names, addresses, Social Security numbers, employment history, family associations, financial indicators, and alleged criminal links. Errors inside those systems are not rare anomalies. Misidentification is routine.

Consumers have been falsely labeled as deceased. Law-abiding citizens have been associated with criminal records belonging to strangers. Living individuals have been linked to dead relatives or people who never shared any family relationship at all. In some cases, Social Security numbers have been entered incorrectly, causing records to merge across unrelated individuals. Once those errors propagate through insurance systems, law enforcement tools, financial institutions, and background checks, damage follows quickly and quietly.

A consumer rarely receives notice. Correction processes are opaque, slow, and burdensome. Harm occurs long before any fix arrives, if one arrives at all.

Law Enforcement Databases and Presumed Guilt

LexisNexis Accurint products are widely marketed to law enforcement agencies. When inaccurate data enters those systems, innocent people can be flagged alongside criminals, suspects, or deceased individuals. The consequence is severe: investigatory bias, denial of services, surveillance, or worse.

A striking example emerged in New Jersey. Approximately 18,000 law enforcement personnel filed a class action lawsuit against LexisNexis Risk Data Management, alleging improper data practices, privacy violations, and retaliation. Proceedings remain ongoing, underscoring a broader truth: even trained professionals inside the system struggle to protect their own data from misuse.

If law enforcement officers face such exposure, consumers stand virtually defenseless.

Settlements as Evidence of Systemic Failure

LexisNexis has paid millions of dollars over more than a decade to resolve lawsuits tied to inaccurate reporting and consumer harm. One prominent case resulted in a $13.5 million settlement over false “deceased” designations that disrupted lives, credit access, insurance, and employment. Separate Fair Credit Reporting Act cases produced additional payouts.

Settlements of that magnitude do not signal isolated mistakes. They represent repeat failures embedded in business operations. Financial penalties have become a cost of doing business rather than a catalyst for reform.

Meanwhile, federal consumer protection authorities in the United States have failed to impose comprehensive oversight on data brokers. No licensing regime exists. No strict accuracy mandates exist. No universal opt-out exists. No meaningful penalties exist that threaten business continuity.

The evidence is clear: millions paid in settlements over many years, yet the same harms continue.

Political Influence and Regulatory Silence

RELX Group, the parent company of LexisNexis, has made political contributions since 1996, predominantly to Democratic candidates, while maintaining contributions to Republicans sufficient to preserve bipartisan access. During recent election cycles, contributions exceeded hundreds of thousands to more than one million dollars per cycle. Political organizations also paid over $5.1 million in the 2024 cycle alone to LexisNexis for data, analytics, donor research, and political intelligence services.

At the same time, LexisNexis actively promotes political research tools to campaigns, advocacy groups, and policymakers.

Regulatory inaction exists alongside that influence. Despite widespread documentation of harm, no aggressive federal consumer privacy regime has emerged to restrain data brokers. State-level efforts remain fragmented, and even those face legislative pressure to weaken enforcement mechanisms.

A reasonable observer could conclude that consumer privacy has been deprioritized in favor of political convenience and corporate profitability.

The Consumer Pays the Price

For consumers, consequences are tangible and personal:

  • Denied insurance coverage

  • Incorrect risk scoring

  • Employment background check failures

  • Credit disruptions

  • Law enforcement scrutiny

  • Identity confusion that takes years to correct

All without consent. All without compensation. All while data brokers profit.

Data brokerage in America operates on a presumption of guilt, not innocence. Once data enters the system, the burden shifts entirely to the individual to prove errors, navigate bureaucracy, and repair damage caused by private corporations operating beyond meaningful oversight.

A Call for Public Awareness and Reform

Protection will not arrive quietly. Awareness must precede accountability. Consumers must understand how personal data is collected, sold, and weaponized against them. Legislators must confront the structural failures allowing data brokers to operate with near immunity. Regulatory agencies must treat repeated settlements as proof of systemic abuse, not minor compliance lapses.

Eighty billion records later, the harm is no longer theoretical. The question is no longer whether consumers are at risk. The question is how long public institutions will tolerate an industry built on unchecked surveillance, error tolerance, and profit extracted from personal vulnerability.

Side note: I have not made 1 dime off of the demise of Americans. Telling the truth doesn't make you prosper, telling the truth gets those in Authority to silence you, even if it badly affects millions of Americans, those in power silence the truth tellers so you are not aware of the harm that can happen or did happen!

Sources and References

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

New

Screams Behind Closed Doors: Full Throttle The Truth No One Wants To Hear

  My son's and I  Nov 12, 2018  Full Throttle  A person who has been physically harmed and mentally abused, witnessed abuse, controlled ...