T.H. Chan School of Public Health’s Disgraceful Failures: Antisemitism, Student Harm, and CCP Collusion Under Justified Federal Scrutiny

From Prestigious Institution to Pariah: How HSPH’s Antisemitic Culture and CCP Ties Betrayed Students

Harvard University, once a beacon of academic excellence, has transformed its T.H. Chan School of Public Health (HSPH) into a hotbed of chaos and disruption, fostering a toxic environment of antisemitism and anti-Israeli bias that has justifiably drawn the full weight of federal scrutiny from the U.S. Department of Education, the Department of Homeland Security, and Congress. The university’s egregious failures, as detailed in the Final Report of the Presidential Task Force on Combating Antisemitism and Anti-Israeli Bias released on April 29, 2025, reveal a shameful betrayal of its students, particularly Jewish and Israeli affiliates, who endured a living hell of discrimination, harassment, and institutional neglect. Harvard’s complicity in allowing faculty and programs to perpetuate hate, coupled with its unethical collaboration with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), warrants not only the government’s aggressive interventions but also civil rights lawsuits from students for the profound harm inflicted. Every available law should be leveraged to hold Harvard accountable, and affected students deserve compensation for the university’s gross violations of their rights.

The 321-page report explicitly identifies HSPH as a primary site of antisemitism, with Harvard acknowledging on page 8 that the school’s leadership inherited significant challenges during the 2023-24 decanal transition, underscoring its problematic practices. HSPH’s collaboration with the CCP’s Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC) a sanctioned entity complicit in the Uyghur genocide further stains its reputation, intensifying federal investigations and a $2 billion funding freeze by the Trump administration. This article examines HSPH’s shameful treatment of students, its problematic practices as acknowledged by Harvard, the CCP’s corrosive influence, and the justified government response, alongside financial context.

Harvard’s Ties to the CCP and Why the U.S. Government Is Cracking Down

 

Uncovering the Controversy Behind Harvard’s Chinese Connections and DHS’s Unprecedented Action

Harvard University, one of the world’s most prestigious schools, is under fire for its connections to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), particularly a group called the Xinjiang Production and Construction Corps (XPCC). This controversy has led to a shocking decision by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to revoke Harvard’s ability to enroll new international students starting in the 2025-2026 academic year. In this article, we’ll break down what’s happening in simple terms, explain the allegations about Harvard’s ties to the CCP, and clarify why DHS is taking such a drastic step. We’ll also look at whether students are directly involved and what this means for Harvard’s future.

What’s the Issue with Harvard and the CCP?

Harvard has been accused of working with the XPCC, a CCP-controlled paramilitary group tied to serious human rights abuses in China’s Xinjiang region. The XPCC is involved in the Uyghur genocide, where millions of Uyghur Muslims have faced forced labor, mass detention, and cultural erasure. In 2020, the U.S. government sanctioned the XPCC under the Global Magnitsky Act, banning American institutions from doing business with it.

Despite these sanctions, Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health reportedly hosted training programs for XPCC officials in 2019, 2023, and as recently as 2024. These programs, part of the China Health Partnership, were designed to teach Chinese officials about healthcare systems, like how to set up insurance programs. The problem? Some of the participants were from the XPCC, a group the U.S. considers a major human rights violator. Critics argue that Harvard’s actions not only broke U.S. sanctions but also gave legitimacy to a group responsible for atrocities.

Beyond the XPCC, Harvard has broader ties to China that raise eyebrows. Since 2012, the university has received over $1.1 billion in foreign funding, with a significant chunk coming from Chinese sources, including $151 million from foreign governments since 2020. Harvard has also partnered with Chinese universities like Tsinghua and Zhejiang, which are linked to the People’s Liberation Army (PLA), China’s military. Some of these collaborations, oddly enough, were even funded by the U.S. Department of Defense, raising concerns about whether Harvard’s research could be helping China’s military.

Kristi Noem’s Capital Burger Blunder: DHS Diva’s Purse Plucked in Pickle-Powered Pilfering

 

Kristi Noem

Thief Swipes $3,000, Badge, and Kristi’s Crime-Busting Mojo Mid-Milkshake at Capital Burger

Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem’s Purse Stolen from D.C. Restaurant

Thief Snags $3,000 Cash, Sensitive Documents in Bold Heist at Capital Burger

On the evening of Sunday, April 20, 2025, Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem became the victim of a brazen theft while dining at the Capital Burger restaurant in downtown Washington, D.C. The incident, which saw a thief make off with Noem’s purse containing approximately $3,000 in cash and several sensitive items, has sparked questions about personal security, situational awareness, and the safety of high-profile officials in the nation’s capital. The Secret Service, responsible for Noem’s protection, is actively investigating the theft, which was captured on security footage.

The Incident: A Quick and Calculated Theft

According to multiple reports, Noem was dining with her family at the Capital Burger when the theft occurred. A law enforcement source revealed that security camera footage showed an unknown white male wearing a medical mask swiftly stealing Noem’s purse before exiting the restaurant. The suspect’s use of a mask has complicated identification efforts, and no additional details about his identity have been released as of April 21, 2025.

Noem initially mistook the theft for her grandchild brushing against her leg, only realizing moments later that her purse was gone, according to a person familiar with the incident. This brief distraction underscores the thief’s opportunism, as the act took place in close proximity to Noem’s Secret Service detail, raising questions about the effectiveness of her security at that moment.

The stolen purse contained a trove of valuable and sensitive items, including:

• Approximately $3,000 in cash
• Noem’s passport
• Driver’s license
• DHS access badge
• Apartment keys
• Prescription medication
• Makeup bag
• Blank checks

The DHS explained that Noem was carrying the large sum of cash to treat her family, including her children and grandchildren, to dinner, Easter activities, and gifts, as they were all in town for the holiday weekend. While this explanation has been widely reported, it has also drawn scrutiny, with some questioning the wisdom of carrying such a significant amount of cash and sensitive documents in a public setting.

The Aftermath: Investigation and Public Reaction

The Secret Service has launched an investigation, focusing on tracing any use of Noem’s financial instruments, such as the blank checks, and reviewing additional evidence to identify the suspect. The theft of a DHS access badge is particularly concerning, as it could potentially compromise security at DHS facilities, though no reports have indicated misuse of the badge thus far.

Noem publicly acknowledged the incident on Monday, April 21, 2025, during an appearance at the White House Easter Egg Roll. She noted that the matter remains unresolved, but she refrained from providing further details, deferring to the ongoing investigation.

Public reaction, particularly on platforms like X, has been a mix of incredulity, criticism, and humor. Some users questioned how the head of Homeland Security could fall victim to a common theft, with one post stating, “How can she keep the homeland secure when she can’t even keep her purse secure??” Others speculated about the competence of her Secret Service detail, with comments like, “If the purse was near her, the Secret Service weren’t very attentive, were they?” Meanwhile, critics highlighted the irony of Noem’s recent remarks about gang activity, pointing out that she had previously flagged a suspect carrying $1,000 as evidence of criminal behavior, yet she herself was carrying three times that amount.

On Reddit, discussions ranged from sarcastic jabs about Noem’s “30-pound makeup bag” to more serious concerns about the potential compromise of sensitive information, with one user noting, “Less about the money and more about the potentially sensitive information/access to sensitive information on any devices in the bag.” Some even speculated, without evidence, about the possibility of the theft being a targeted act, though authorities have not suggested this was anything other than a random crime.

Context: Crime in D.C. and Noem’s Role

The theft comes at a time when crime in Washington, D.C., remains a significant issue, though violent crime reportedly hit a 30-year low in 2024, according to the U.S. Attorney’s office. Property crimes, such as theft, continue to plague the city, and Noem’s experience underscores the vulnerability even high-profile individuals face in public spaces.

As DHS Secretary, Noem oversees critical national security functions, including border control, immigration, counterterrorism, and cybersecurity. Her department also includes agencies like the Secret Service, which is now tasked with investigating the very incident that occurred under its watch. The optics of the situation are challenging for Noem, who has positioned herself as a tough-on-crime figure. Critics, including some on X, have seized on the incident to question her competence, with one user quipping, “She can’t even handle being the Handbag Security Secretary, and people think she can be the Homeland Security Secretary.”

Broader Implications

The theft raises several broader questions. First, it highlights the risks of carrying large sums of cash and sensitive items, particularly for someone in Noem’s position. While DHS has defended her actions, the decision to carry $3,000 in cash, a passport, and a DHS badge in a single purse has been called “plain stupid” by some, including a self-professed Noem supporter on a Free Republic forum.

Second, the incident exposes potential gaps in the security protocols for high-ranking officials. Noem’s Secret Service detail, while present, was unable to prevent the theft, prompting speculation about whether the purse was left unattended or if the detail was momentarily distracted. This has fueled online debates about the adequacy of her protection, with one X user asking, “Where’s her Sherlock Holmes costume?”

Finally, the loss of a DHS access badge and blank checks could have security implications, though the Secret Service’s proactive monitoring of Noem’s financial accounts may mitigate some risks. The incident serves as a reminder of the need for heightened vigilance, even for those tasked with protecting the nation.

Conclusion

The theft of Kristi Noem’s purse at a Washington, D.C., restaurant is more than a personal misfortune; it’s a public relations challenge for a DHS Secretary already under scrutiny for her high-profile role. While the $3,000 in cash has drawn headlines, the theft of sensitive items like a DHS badge and passport underscores the potential gravity of the incident. As the Secret Service continues its investigation, Noem faces the task of reassuring the public that she can secure the homeland, even as critics question her ability to secure her own belongings. For now, the unknown thief remains at large, leaving Noem—and the nation—awaiting answers in a city where even the head of Homeland Security isn’t immune to crime.

The Passing of Pope Francis: A Legacy of Compassion and the Path Forward

 

A Time of Mourning and Transition for the Catholic Church

On April 21, 2025, the Roman Catholic Church and the global community mourned the death of Pope Francis, the first Latin American and Jesuit pontiff, who passed away at the age of 88 in his residence at the Vatican’s Casa Santa Marta. His death marks the end of a transformative 12-year papacy defined by humility, advocacy for the marginalized, and efforts to modernize the Church. As the Vatican enters a period of transition, ancient rituals and protocols will guide the mourning process, the funeral, and the election of a new pope. This article explores Pope Francis’ life, the events following his death, the upcoming funeral, and the process of selecting his successor.

 

Pope Francis has died on Easter Monday aged 88 Vatican News - English

Pope Francis’ Life: A Journey of Service

Born Jorge Mario Bergoglio on December 17, 1936, in Buenos Aires, Argentina, to Italian immigrant parents, Pope Francis grew up in a working-class family. A severe respiratory illness in his youth, which led to the removal of part of one lung, deepened his faith and inspired his vocation. He joined the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) in 1958 and was ordained a priest in 1969. From 1973 to 1979, he served as the Jesuit provincial superior in Argentina during the country’s Dirty War, a period of political violence that shaped his pastoral approach. In 1998, he was appointed Archbishop of Buenos Aires, and in 2001, Pope John Paul II named him a cardinal.

Elected pope on March 13, 2013, following Pope Benedict XVI’s historic resignation, Francis became the first non-European pope in over 1,200 years and the first from the Americas. His papacy emphasized mercy, environmental stewardship—most notably through the 2015 encyclical Laudato Si’—and outreach to the poor, refugees, and interfaith communities. Known for his simple lifestyle, such as rejecting the papal apartments for a modest Vatican guesthouse, he sought to embody the Church’s mission of service. However, his progressive stances on issues like climate change, migration, and inclusivity drew criticism from conservative factions, who argued he diluted traditional doctrines. Despite health challenges, including chronic respiratory issues and mobility limitations requiring a wheelchair, Francis remained active, making a public appearance in St. Peter’s Square on Easter Sunday, April 20, 2025, a day before his death.

What Happens Next: The Sede Vacante and Mourning Period

Upon Pope Francis’ death, the Vatican entered the sede vacante (Latin for “vacant seat”), a transitional phase during which the College of Cardinals assumes temporary governance of the Church’s administrative affairs, deferring major decisions until a new pope is elected. Cardinal Kevin Joseph Farrell, the Camerlengo of the Holy Roman Church, is responsible for overseeing the Vatican’s temporal operations during this period, including confirming the pope’s death. While the traditional ritual of calling the pope’s baptismal name three times has been largely modernized, the ascertainment of death now occurs privately, often in a chapel setting.

The Church observes a nine-day mourning period known as the novemdiales, during which Requiem Masses and prayer services are held globally. Pope Francis’ body will lie in state in St. Peter’s Basilica for several days, allowing the faithful, clergy, and dignitaries to pay their respects. Reflecting his preference for simplicity, the Vatican has indicated that the lying-in-state will avoid elaborate displays.

The Funeral Service at the Vatican

Pope Francis’ funeral is expected to take place between April 25 and April 27, 2025, in accordance with the apostolic constitution Universi Dominici Gregis, which governs papal transitions. The Mass, likely presided over by Cardinal Giovanni Battista Re, the dean of the College of Cardinals, will be held in St. Peter’s Square, drawing thousands of mourners, including world leaders, Catholic faithful, and ecumenical representatives. The rite will be conducted primarily in Latin, with prayers in multiple languages to reflect the Church’s universality.

In line with Francis’ wishes for simplicity, as outlined in the revised 2024 Ordo Exsequiarum Romani Pontificis, his body will be placed in a single wooden coffin lined with zinc, forgoing the traditional triple coffins (cypress, lead, and oak) and organ preservation. Departing from centuries of precedent, Francis will not be buried in the Vatican Grottoes beneath St. Peter’s Basilica, where nearly 100 popes rest. Instead, he will be interred at the Basilica of Santa Maria Maggiore in Rome, a church he visited frequently to pray before the icon of Salus Populi Romani, the Virgin Mary. This makes him the first pope since Pope Leo XIII (buried at St. John Lateran in 1903) to be laid to rest outside the Vatican.

The Cardinal Successor: The Conclave Process

The election of Pope Francis’ successor will occur during a papal conclave, a closed-door gathering of cardinal electors in the Sistine Chapel, scheduled to begin 15 to 20 days after his death, likely between May 6 and May 11, 2025. The College of Cardinals currently consists of approximately 250 members, with around 136 cardinals under the age of 80 eligible to vote, as stipulated by Universi Dominici Gregis. Pope Francis appointed roughly 80% of these electors, increasing representation from regions like Africa, Asia, and Latin America, which may shape the selection of a pope attuned to global challenges.

In the conclave, cardinals take an oath of secrecy and vote up to four times daily, writing their chosen candidate’s name on a ballot and placing it in a chalice. A two-thirds majority (approximately 91 votes, depending on attendance) is required to elect the new pope. After each round, ballots are burned, with black smoke signaling no decision and white smoke indicating a successful election. The senior cardinal deacon then proclaims “Habemus Papam” (“We have a pope”) from St. Peter’s Basilica’s balcony, introducing the new pontiff, who chooses a papal name.

While any baptized male Catholic is theoretically eligible, the pope has been selected from among the cardinals for over seven centuries. Potential candidates, or papabile, include:

• Cardinal Pietro Parolin (70, Italy), the Vatican Secretary of State, known for his diplomatic experience and alignment with Francis’ vision.
• Cardinal Matteo Zuppi (69, Italy), Archbishop of Bologna, noted for his peace advocacy and progressive pastoral approach.
• Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo Besungu (65, Democratic Republic of Congo), a prominent African cardinal with a focus on social justice.

The conclave’s outcome is unpredictable, as cardinals do not publicly campaign, and deliberations remain confidential.

Conclusion: A Legacy and a New Chapter

Pope Francis’ death concludes a papacy marked by compassion, reform, and a commitment to the marginalized, leaving a Church more inclusive yet grappling with internal divisions. As the Vatican prepares for his funeral and the election of a new pope, the world observes a historic institution navigating a modern transition. His burial at Santa Maria Maggiore will reflect his devotion to simplicity and the Virgin Mary, while the conclave will determine the future direction of the Catholic Church for its 1.4 billion followers.

Sources:

Vatican News: https://www.vaticannews.va

The New York Times: https://www.nytimes.com
Catholic News Agency: https://www.catholicnewsagency.com
Reuters: https://www.reuters.com
Wikipedia (for historical context): https://en.wikipedia.org
Universi Dominici Gregis (Vatican document): https://www.vatican.va
Ordo Exsequiarum Romani Pontificis (2024 revision, referenced via Vatican News)