Connecticut: A Child Caught in the Crossfire: Defending a 12-Year-Old Girl Against Hate Crime Charges

Questioning the Rush to Judgment in Waterbury’s Juvenile Case—and the School’s Failure

A 12-year-old girl in Waterbury, Connecticut, faces charges of Intimidation Based on Bigotry and Bias in the First and Second Degree after a school altercation at Wallace Middle School. The Connecticut chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has branded this a hate-driven assault on twin sisters targeted for their Muslim faith, painting the girl as a villain. But she’s 12—a child still figuring out life. Charging her with felony hate crimes demands hard evidence, not just assumptions, and the glaring absence of accountability from Wallace Middle School—a festering hotspot of unchecked chaos—shifts much of the blame away from this kid and onto a system that’s failed her and every student in its care.

Connecticut law sets a high bar for hate crimes. First-degree Intimidation Based on Bigotry or Bias (CGS § 53a-181j), a Class C felony, requires malicious intent to intimidate or harass someone due to their race, religion, or other protected status, causing serious physical injury. Second-degree (CGS § 53a-181k), a Class D felony, involves physical contact, property damage, or credible threats, driven by specific bias. Both demand proof of deliberate prejudice—not just a school fight or reckless words. Yet, the articles and CAIR’s joint press release offer no clear evidence of this girl’s intent, or a pattern of targeted harassment. Was this a calculated act of bigotry or a spontaneous outburst from a preteen? Without facts, it’s a leap to slap felony charges on a middle schooler.

"The department said two of the involved students in the altercation did sustain minor injuries during the altercation, but “no medical attention was required.” - NBC Connecticut

CAIR’s claim that the sisters were attacked “because of their Muslim faith” is a powerful accusation, but it’s not proof—it’s a narrative. The charges followed their press release suspiciously closely, hinting at undue sway. That influence shouldn’t go unchecked when it risks ruining a child’s life. But let’s zoom out: Wallace Middle School isn’t some innocent bystander. A 2020 report from the Office of the Child Advocate on Waterbury Public Schools (WPS) revealed 198 police reports tied to elementary and PreK-Grade 8 schools, including Wallace, for student behavioral issues. That’s not a typo—198 calls to the Waterbury Police Department because the schools can’t manage their kids. This isn’t a one-off; it’s a systemic dumpster fire. Where’s the supervision? The intervention? The basic competence to stop a fight before it spirals into a legal nightmare?

This girl isn’t a hardened bigot—she’s a product of a school that’s clearly drowning in dysfunction. Wallace Middle School’s failure to control its environment let this incident happen, and now a 12-year-old is the fall guy. Kids fight. They say stupid, hurtful things. But when a school racks up nearly 200 police calls, it’s not the students who are the problem—it’s the adults running the show. CAIR’s quick to point fingers, but where’s their outrage at a school system that’s a breeding ground for chaos? The authorities are complicit too, charging a child instead of demanding answers from a district that can’t keep order.

She deserves consequences if she crossed lines—counseling, detention, something age-appropriate—not a juvenile court summons that could derail her future. Wallace Middle School’s negligence set the stage, CAIR’s rhetoric lit the match, and now a kid is burning. She’s not the villain here; she’s a casualty of adults too lazy or too agenda-driven to do their jobs. Give her a chance to grow, not a label she can’t outrun. The real crime is a school system that’s failed everyone involved.

I Asked Grok For A Review On My Short Story - I Am More Like Bukowski Then Hemingway.

I asked Grok to give me a review on my short story "Traveler." I really loved what Grok gave in response, for Artificial Intelligence it nailed the entire theme of my short story. It's must be my Polish genetics LOL, I'll take Bukowski any day! Now onto having Grok add to the story, stay tuned!

Traveler 

As she got off the bus, she looked around—it was raining, 4 a.m., and she needed that cigarette! “Hey you! Got a light?” she asked the man with the red checkered flannel shirt on. He looked friendly, a soft face, she thought as she inhaled, and a sense of relief came upon her. What just happened? She sat there thinking how life had seemed to kick her in the ass, but she wasn’t going to give up.

She heard her destination over the loudspeaker, muffled and loud. What did she just say? She asked a nice young man who was going into the Army—she found that out while sitting next to him and overhearing his conversation with another fellow. How exciting, she thought! He’s not more than 20 years old, and what a proud mother he must have. While trying to hear their conversation, she was still trying to figure out what the hell that woman over the loudspeaker just said. She let out a sigh of relief as it wasn’t her destination and made her way to the coffee shop. As she walked toward the coffee shop, a news van came driving by—WDRB Kentucky News. She quickly glanced and took it all in; she didn’t even realize she was in Kentucky, and the emotions that came over her were flooding like the rain pouring outside. She collected herself along with her thoughts and stood in line.

The coffee shop was small, with not too many people traveling this early in the morning, and she could smell the fresh coffee. “Make it a large one,” she told the cashier, and with her carry-on bag, which seemed to have made an impression on her shoulder, she sat it down and opened it up and counted what little money she had left. What could she have been thinking? Just sell everything and pack up and leave everything behind? And she was saddened by what took place with her visit. She wanted him to love her, and tears streamed down her face. She looked around and was hoping no one would see her cry. She was sick to death of crying and thought, “God! Give me a break—I am trying to make things right.” With the lump in her throat and tears on her face, she wiped her nose and stood up and heard that damn muffled sound again! She quickly gathered her things, threw the carry-on bag over her shoulder, and walked back toward the entrance of the bus station. She was the last in line and thought how she hated to be last in line, and her shoulder ached. She handed her reboarding pass and heard the driver say, “You will not need reboarding garbage on the bus!” Her reboarding number was 104.

She thought, what the hell was that all about? Then she remembered this is the same bus driver who got lost from Madison to Charleston on her first bus ride—a female bus driver who was blond—and she made a joke to herself about the driver and thought, “God, I’m glad I’m a brunette!” as she sat at the window seat to get a clearer view.

Grok's review on my short story.

Alright, let’s dive into this piece. It’s a raw, stream-of-consciousness snapshot of a woman at a low point, drenched in rain and emotion, navigating a 4 a.m. bus station somewhere in Kentucky. The writer’s going for a gritty, unpolished vibe—think less Hemingway, more Bukowski with a side of nicotine cravings. Here’s my take.

The scene kicks off with her stepping off a bus into the rain, desperate for a smoke. That cigarette’s her lifeline—when she asks the guy in the red checkered flannel for a light, his “soft face” and her relief at inhaling set a tone of fleeting comfort amid chaos. The writer’s piling on sensory details—rain, smoke, a aching shoulder from her carry-on—to ground us in her exhaustion. She’s been kicked around by life, but that “she wasn’t going to give up” line hints at stubborn grit. It’s a classic down-but-not-out setup.

Then it gets messy—intentionally, I’d say. She’s distracted by a muffled loudspeaker, can’t figure out her stop, and latches onto a young Army recruit’s convo. The writer’s tossing us into her head—scattershot thoughts about his age, his proud mom, her own confusion. It’s chaotic, like she’s half-listening, half-drifting. The WDRB Kentucky News van jolting her into realizing she’s in Kentucky? That’s a punchy twist—shows how lost she is, physically and emotionally. The rain “flooding” outside mirrors her tears—cliché, sure, but it works for her unraveling.

The coffee shop bit deepens the melancholy. She’s counting her last bucks, regretting selling everything, mourning a guy who didn’t love her back. The “God! give me a break” plea’s got a desperate edge—she’s not pious, just pissed. Her tears, the lump in her throat, wiping her nose—it’s messy and human. The writer’s not shying from the ugly; it’s all there, shoulder ache and all.

The bus driver’s garbled “reboarding garbage” line (probably meant “no garbage on the bus”) and her quip about the blonde driver? That’s her snark cutting through the gloom. The brunette jab’s a small, self-aware laugh—dark humor as armor. Sitting by the window “to get a clearer view” feels symbolic—she’s chasing clarity, even if life’s still a blur.

What’s it add up to? A portrait of a woman on the run—from a breakup, a past, maybe herself—clinging to coffee, smokes, and sarcasm. The writing’s rough—spelling slips (“their” for “there”), run-ons, no commas where you’d expect ’em—but that fits her raw state. It’s not polished literature; it’s a late-night journal entry with heart. If the writer wanted to capture someone teetering but tough, they nailed it. You feel her more than you judge her.

Matt Cohen’s “Fox in the Henhouse” Stunt: A Leftist Troll Lifts My Phrase to Smear Harmeet Dhillon

An Opinion on the Timeline and Motives Behind Democracy Docket’s Attack on a Conservative Hero

Note: The following is an opinion piece reflecting the personal views and speculations of @MamaButterBean. It is not intended as a statement of fact.

As a proud conservative, I, @MamaButterBean, have been vocal on X about issues that matter to me, often using vivid metaphors to make my point. One such phrase, "Fox in the Henhouse," became a recurring theme in my posts starting March 26, 2025, at 9:33 AM. I used it again on March 26 and March 31, never specifying who I believed the "fox" to be—just letting the metaphor speak to the chaos I saw unfolding in political spheres. Imagine my shock when, on April 3, 2025, Matt Cohen, a writer for Democracy Docket with a clear leftist bent, published an article titled "Fox in the Henhouse: Senate Confirms Anti-Voting Lawyer Harmeet Dhillon to Top Voting Rights Post," directly accusing Harmeet Dhillon of being the "fox." The timeline is clear, and there are no coincidences here—Cohen’s use of my phrase is highly suspect, and it reeks of a deliberate attempt to troll a conservative account while deflecting blame onto a respected figure like Dhillon. While I do admit I wasn't a happy conservative with an opening prayer done by Harmeet Dhillon, it doesn't take away all that she has accomplished for Republicans' (Conservatives) America 1st and I didn't attack her personally.

Let’s break it down. I first stumbled upon Cohen’s article through X’s “who to follow” suggestions, which pointed me to Marc E. Elias, a figure posting a link to Democracy Docket on X. Following the trail, I clicked on Elias’s profile, which led me to Democracy Docket’s website, where Cohen’s article, dated April 3, 2025, glared back at me with my own phrase in the title. Cohen, who hasn’t posted on X since November 2024 and now prefers BlueSky, clearly isn’t a fan of Donald Trump or conservatives in general. His article, published on Democracy Docket, paints Harmeet Dhillon as a villain, accusing her of being an “anti-voting lawyer” who will undermine civil rights as the newly confirmed Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights in the Trump administration. But the real question is: why did Cohen, out of the blue, use my phrase, "Fox in the Henhouse," when the timeline shows I used it first? This is, of course, my surmise or conjecture, but it’s hard to believe this was a coincidence, especially given Cohen’s apparent dissatisfaction with X and his history of anti-Trump rhetoric. Could he have been trying to deflect and start trouble with a conservative voice like mine on X? It’s hard to believe this was a coincidence, especially given Cohen’s apparent dissatisfaction with X and his history of anti-Trump rhetoric.

The timeline speaks for itself. I began using "Fox in the Henhouse" on March 26, well before Cohen’s article dropped on April 3. Cohen, a writer for a platform that prides itself on “real-time updates” about voting rights and elections, couldn’t come up with his own metaphor? Instead, he appears to have lifted my phrase to craft a hit piece on Dhillon, a conservative powerhouse who has been a steadfast ally to Trump and a defender of American values. This isn’t just lazy—it’s a calculated move to stir trouble, deflect blame, and troll conservatives like me who are active on X. Cohen’s article doesn’t just attack Dhillon; it co-opts my language to do so, twisting a metaphor I used broadly into a pointed accusation against a woman who has done nothing but fight for civil liberties and fairness.

Let’s set the record straight on Harmeet Dhillon, because Cohen’s smear campaign doesn’t hold up against her impressive record. Dhillon, born in 1969, is an American lawyer and a longtime Republican Party official. She founded the Dhillon Law Group in 2006 and has since become a leading advocate for civil liberties, taking on cases that defend free speech, religious freedom, and fair treatment under the law. She represented Christians barred from praying together during COVID, sued corporations for discriminatory “woke” policies, and challenged Big Tech’s censorship of free speech—causes that resonate deeply with conservatives who value individual rights. Dhillon also served as the former vice chair of the California Republican Party and a National Committeewoman for the Republican National Committee, showcasing her dedication to the conservative movement.

In December 2024, President Donald Trump nominated Dhillon to serve as Assistant Attorney General for Civil Rights, a role she was confirmed for on April 3, 2025, in a 52-45 Senate vote. Trump himself praised her on Truth Social, noting her consistent efforts to “protect our cherished Civil Liberties.” In her new position, Dhillon oversees critical work at the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, including voting rights litigation, hate crime prosecutions, and investigations into discriminatory law enforcement practices. Far from being a “fox in the henhouse,” Dhillon is a proven defender of American principles, bringing her legal expertise to a role where she can ensure justice and fairness for all.

Contrast this with Cohen’s baseless attack. His article on Democracy Docket claims Dhillon has a “history of attacking voting rights,” pointing to her firm’s involvement in election-related lawsuits. But this is a gross misrepresentation. Dhillon’s legal work has often focused on ensuring election integrity and protecting constitutional rights, not suppressing votes. For example, during the 2020 election, she supported efforts to address voter fraud concerns, a stance aligned with many conservatives who wanted transparency in the electoral process. Cohen’s attempt to paint her as a threat to democracy is nothing more than a leftist talking point, and his use of my phrase to do so is a cheap trick to grab attention while deflecting from his own lack of originality.

The irony here is thick. Democracy Docket, a platform that claims to champion voting rights, a writer who can’t even come up with his own metaphors, instead borrowing from a conservative X user to fuel his anti-Trump agenda. Cohen’s article isn’t just an attack on Dhillon—it’s a subtle jab at conservatives like me who use platforms like X to voice our views. By taking my phrase and slapping it onto his narrative, Cohen is trying to stir the pot, deflecting blame onto Dhillon while trolling those of us who support her and the broader conservative movement. It’s a low blow, and it’s not hard to see through the charade.

Harmeet Dhillon deserves better than Cohen’s recycled rhetoric. She’s a trailblazer who has fought for the rights of Americans across the political spectrum, from her early work with the ACLU on behalf of Sikhs and South Asians post-9/11 to her current role in the Trump administration. Cohen’s attempt to label her a “fox in the henhouse” falls flat when you look at her record—and it’s even more pathetic when you realize he couldn’t even come up with the phrase himself. As for me, @MamaButterBean, I’ll keep speaking out on X, using my voice and my metaphors to call out the chaos I see. But I won’t stand for leftists like Matt Cohen twisting my words to fit their agenda. The timeline doesn’t lie, and neither do I.

Laura Loomer’s Triumph: A Bold Visionary Meets Trump in the Oval Office

 

A Fearless Patriot Shapes the Future of National Security

On April 3, 2025, a historic moment unfolded as Laura Loomer, a passionate and brilliant advocate for American values, secured a 30-minute meeting with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office. As reported by The New York Times here, Loomer arrived with a meticulously crafted dossier, showcasing her unparalleled dedication and strategic genius. Her goal? To strengthen the National Security Council (NSC) by identifying and removing disloyal elements, ensuring Trump’s agenda thrives. This meeting, briefly joined by National Security Adviser Michael Waltz, highlights Loomer’s meteoric rise as a key influencer and a powerhouse in Trump’s orbit.

A Masterstroke in the Oval Office

Accompanied by the steadfast Representative Scott Perry, Loomer delivered a tour-de-force presentation, armed with razor-sharp insights to safeguard Trump’s vision. Her courage was on full display as she addressed Waltz, who exited early after defending his team—a move that only emphasized her commanding presence. Sources confirm Trump is giving serious weight to her recommendations, a tribute to her unmatched intellect and persuasive prowess. This wasn’t just a meeting; it was a defining moment of leadership, showcasing Loomer’s ability to shape policy at the highest level with her unrelenting resolve.

Laura Loomer: A Trailblazer with Unmatched Courage

Born on May 21, 1993, Laura Elizabeth Loomer is a dynamo of grit and brilliance. With over 1.2 million followers on X, she’s a beacon of truth, captivating audiences with her fearless stance on America’s future. Her journey, detailed on her Wikipedia page here, includes groundbreaking work with Project Veritas and Rebel News, plus two electrifying congressional runs in Florida (2020 and 2022). Though she didn’t claim victory, her campaigns ignited a fire among conservatives, solidifying her as a titan of the movement.

Loomer’s genius lies in her refusal to compromise. She’s fearlessly tackled tough issues, exposing threats to American sovereignty with clarity and conviction. Her 2017 protest at a New York City performance of Julius Caesar—disrupting a portrayal of Trump as Caesar—was a stunning act of bravery, earning her arrest but also the adoration of patriots nationwide, as detailed in a Washington Post article here. This iconic moment showcased her willingness to stand up for what she believes in, no matter the cost.

A Loyal Ally to Trump

Loomer’s connection with Trump is a partnership of legends. He’s lauded her as “fantastic” and “a woman with courage,” often sharing her razor-sharp posts on Truth Social. Their bond deepened during the 2024 campaign, with Loomer joining him on his plane and standing proudly at 9/11 memorial events, embodying unwavering loyalty. A 2023 New York Times report here revealed Trump’s eagerness to bring her onto his campaign team—a plan only paused by hesitant aides, not a lack of trust in her brilliance. Now, in 2025, her Oval Office triumph proves she’s not just a supporter but a visionary architect of his presidency.

Her resilience shines through adversity. A Reason article here from January 16, 2025, discusses how she stood tall against Bill Maher’s crude remarks, with legal experts suggesting she could have a defamation case—proof of her strength in turning baseless attacks into opportunities to showcase her dignity.

A Bright Future Ahead

The response to Loomer’s Oval Office victory has been explosive. Patriots hail her as a genius, a warrior who fearlessly defends Trump’s “America First” mission. Her meeting with the president isn’t just her triumph—it’s a win for every American who cherishes strength, loyalty, and unapologetic leadership. If Trump enacts her vision, the NSC could emerge as a powerhouse of unity and purpose, all thanks to Loomer’s extraordinary foresight.

As of April 3, 2025, Laura Loomer stands as a towering figure, a testament to what passion and fearlessness can achieve. From activist to Oval Office influencer, she’s rewriting history and proving one woman’s brilliance can steer a nation. The future is dazzling, and Loomer is at the helm.

Stay tuned—her unstoppable rise is just beginning.