Connecticut: A Child Caught in the Crossfire: Defending a 12-Year-Old Girl Against Hate Crime Charges

Questioning the Rush to Judgment in Waterbury’s Juvenile Case—and the School’s Failure

A 12-year-old girl in Waterbury, Connecticut, faces charges of Intimidation Based on Bigotry and Bias in the First and Second Degree after a school altercation at Wallace Middle School. The Connecticut chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has branded this a hate-driven assault on twin sisters targeted for their Muslim faith, painting the girl as a villain. But she’s 12—a child still figuring out life. Charging her with felony hate crimes demands hard evidence, not just assumptions, and the glaring absence of accountability from Wallace Middle School—a festering hotspot of unchecked chaos—shifts much of the blame away from this kid and onto a system that’s failed her and every student in its care.

Connecticut law sets a high bar for hate crimes. First-degree Intimidation Based on Bigotry or Bias (CGS § 53a-181j), a Class C felony, requires malicious intent to intimidate or harass someone due to their race, religion, or other protected status, causing serious physical injury. Second-degree (CGS § 53a-181k), a Class D felony, involves physical contact, property damage, or credible threats, driven by specific bias. Both demand proof of deliberate prejudice—not just a school fight or reckless words. Yet, the articles and CAIR’s joint press release offer no clear evidence of this girl’s intent, or a pattern of targeted harassment. Was this a calculated act of bigotry or a spontaneous outburst from a preteen? Without facts, it’s a leap to slap felony charges on a middle schooler.

"The department said two of the involved students in the altercation did sustain minor injuries during the altercation, but “no medical attention was required.” - NBC Connecticut

CAIR’s claim that the sisters were attacked “because of their Muslim faith” is a powerful accusation, but it’s not proof—it’s a narrative. The charges followed their press release suspiciously closely, hinting at undue sway. That influence shouldn’t go unchecked when it risks ruining a child’s life. But let’s zoom out: Wallace Middle School isn’t some innocent bystander. A 2020 report from the Office of the Child Advocate on Waterbury Public Schools (WPS) revealed 198 police reports tied to elementary and PreK-Grade 8 schools, including Wallace, for student behavioral issues. That’s not a typo—198 calls to the Waterbury Police Department because the schools can’t manage their kids. This isn’t a one-off; it’s a systemic dumpster fire. Where’s the supervision? The intervention? The basic competence to stop a fight before it spirals into a legal nightmare?

This girl isn’t a hardened bigot—she’s a product of a school that’s clearly drowning in dysfunction. Wallace Middle School’s failure to control its environment let this incident happen, and now a 12-year-old is the fall guy. Kids fight. They say stupid, hurtful things. But when a school racks up nearly 200 police calls, it’s not the students who are the problem—it’s the adults running the show. CAIR’s quick to point fingers, but where’s their outrage at a school system that’s a breeding ground for chaos? The authorities are complicit too, charging a child instead of demanding answers from a district that can’t keep order.

She deserves consequences if she crossed lines—counseling, detention, something age-appropriate—not a juvenile court summons that could derail her future. Wallace Middle School’s negligence set the stage, CAIR’s rhetoric lit the match, and now a kid is burning. She’s not the villain here; she’s a casualty of adults too lazy or too agenda-driven to do their jobs. Give her a chance to grow, not a label she can’t outrun. The real crime is a school system that’s failed everyone involved.

Disclaimer & Sources, this article reflects sentiment and opinions, not necessarily facts. Sources, links, and views may not represent the author’s personal stance. and nothing in this article should be interpreted as such and or advice, legal advice. You have read the article and by reading the article you came to your own conclusions and used your own thoughts. (Leave a comment) If you spot an error, please contact me promptly to correct it ellenniedz@gmail.com. Rights of logos placed here are for recognition for the blind or eyesight problems on this blog. 😎 You can buy me a coffee here and it's very much appreciated. Thank you

Image by DCL using neural.love