Monday, December 8, 2025

Public School Caught Forcing Islam Indoctrination on Students: Thomas More Law Center Takes Fight to U.S. Supreme Court

 


This case is bigger than one school in New Jersey. If the lower court’s ruling stands, school districts across America will have a green light to push Islam.




In 2017, seventh-graders at Chatham Middle School in New Jersey walked into what was supposed to be a simple World Cultures class. Instead, they were hit with blatant religious recruitment for Islam, paid for by taxpayer dollars and required for a passing grade.The materials were shocking:
  • A five-minute video titled “Intro to Islam” declared as undisputed fact that “Allah is the one God,” “Muhammad is the last and final Messenger of God,” and the Quran is the “perfect guide for humanity.”
  • The same video closed with an on-screen prayer: “May God help us all find the true faith, Islam. Ameen.”
  • Students were then handed worksheets forcing them to fill in the blank for the Shahada, the Islamic declaration of faith: “There is no God but ____ and ____ is his messenger.”
No similar videos or worksheets were ever shown for Christianity, Judaism, Hinduism, or any other religion. Just Islam, presented not as one belief among many, but as the truth students were expected to accept.
When Christian mother Libby Hilsenrath discovered what her 12-year-old son was being taught, she went to the school board. They ignored her. She sued. Federal courts, including the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, ruled in favor of the school district, claiming this aggressive proselytizing was just “education.”
Now the Thomas More Law Center has taken the case to the United States Supreme Court, asking the justices to reverse that dangerous decision.
The Thomas More Law Center is making sure the highest court in the land hears that message loud and clear. Get updates here: Thomas More Law Center

The petition argues that forcing children to memorize and recite a religious conversion statement in a mandatory public-school class is textbook government endorsement of religion, exactly what the First Amendment forbids. It points to the Supreme Court’s 2022 Kennedy v. Bremerton decision, which told courts to look at “history and tradition” when deciding Establishment Clause cases. Under any honest historical reading, public schools have never been allowed to act as missionaries for one faith.
This case is bigger than one school in New Jersey. If the lower court’s ruling stands, school districts across America will have a green light to push Islam, or any other religion, while telling objecting parents to sit down and be quiet. Classrooms could become recruitment centers, and the fundamental right of parents to direct their children’s religious upbringing, a right the Supreme Court has called “deeply rooted in our history”, would be gutted.
Parents send their kids to school to learn math, science, and history, not to be told which God they should worship. Yet that is exactly what Chatham Middle School did, and lower courts incredibly called it constitutional.
The Supreme Court now has the chance to slam the door on this overreach. Every parent in America should be watching. Your children’s Christian faith is not Islam to shape. 



All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-Galileo


Image: Lady Justice: https://www.freepik.com/free-ai-image/lady-justice-statue-front-courthouse-sunset_418993811.htm

Sunday, December 7, 2025

Thomas Barrack’s Doha Betrayal: Trashing Israeli Democracy While Bowing to Qatar’s “Benevolent” Dictatorship

Thomas J. Barrack



Thomas Barrack, the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey and Special Envoy for Syria under the Trump administration, made headlines at the 2025 Doha Forum in Qatar with remarks that have been widely criticized as misguided, hypocritical, and antithetical to core American principles.



 


The "nonsense" here isn't just in the factual inaccuracies, it's in the profound irony, cultural tone-deafness, and political self-sabotage of delivering such a message from a platform in one of the world's most repressive regimes. Let's break it down point by point.




1. Dismissing Israel as a Democracy Is Factually Baseless
  • Israel is a parliamentary democracy with universal suffrage, competitive multi-party elections held every four years (or sooner if needed), an independent judiciary, and a free press that routinely criticizes the government. It's ranked as a "free" nation by organizations like Freedom House, scoring higher on democratic metrics than many European countries. Yes, it faces valid critiques, such as inequalities for Arab Israelis or the challenges of governing occupied territories, but these don't negate its democratic foundations, any more than U.S. issues with gerrymandering or racial disparities strip America of its democratic status.
  • Barrack's casual "Israel can claim that it’s a democracy" implies it's some kind of sham, which echoes anti-Israel propaganda often amplified in authoritarian states like Qatar (home to Al Jazeera, a state-funded network accused of bias against Israel). This isn't neutral analysis; it's a rhetorical sleight-of-hand that undermines a key U.S. ally while pandering to the audience.
2. Praising "Benevolent Monarchies" in Qatar? The Height of Hypocrisy
  • Qatar isn't a "benevolent" monarchy, it's an absolute one ruled by Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani, with no elections for its citizens, severe restrictions on free speech, assembly, and the press, and a legal system rooted in Sharia law that discriminates against women, LGBTQ+ individuals, and migrant workers (who make up 88% of the population and endure kafala sponsorship abuses akin to modern slavery).
  • By lauding monarchies as the "best" model for the Middle East, Barrack is essentially endorsing the very system hosting him: a gas-rich autocracy that funds Hamas, hosts Taliban leaders, and meddles in regional conflicts while projecting a veneer of moderation. Doing this at the Doha Forum, Qatar's annual PR extravaganza for soft power, makes it feel like paid flattery, especially given Barrack's history as a billionaire investor with ties to Gulf money.
  • If "what has worked best" is the metric, Qatar's stability comes at the cost of human dignity, not some enlightened benevolence. True progress in the region (e.g., UAE's economic diversification or Jordan's relative openness) often stems from pragmatic reforms, not divine-right rule.
3. This Undermines U.S. Values and Trump's "America First" Brand
  • The U.S. has long championed democracy as a bulwark against tyranny, from the Marshall Plan to the Arab Spring (flawed as interventions were). Barrack's comments flip that script, suggesting autocracy is preferable for "this region" implying cultural inferiority that reeks of orientalism. It's as if he's saying, "Democracy works for us, but not for them," which erodes America's moral authority.
  • As a Trump appointee (Barrack chaired Trump's 2017 inaugural committee and is a longtime confidant), this stings extra hard. Trump's "America First" rhetoric emphasized strength through freedom, alliances with democracies like Israel, and skepticism of foreign entanglements, not cozying up to emirs while trashing democratic partners. Surrounding himself with figures like Barrack, who prioritize deal-making over principles, risks alienating pro-Israel conservatives and signaling weakness to adversaries.
  • Critics, including Trump allies like Laura Loomer, have called it out as "inappropriate" and influenced by "Arab money," highlighting how Gulf petrodollars can corrupt foreign policy. It's not "America First" it's "Emir's Purse First."

In short, Barrack's remarks aren't just wrong; they're a self-own that emboldens autocrats, insults allies, and confuses U.S. messaging at a pivotal moment for Syria and the Middle East. If the goal was to discuss Syria pragmatically, why not advocate for inclusive governance with checks on power, rather than romanticizing crowns? This kind of nonsense erodes trust faster than it builds deals. 


All truths are easy to understand once they are discovered; the point is to discover them.-Galileo

New

The $176.4 Billion Minibus: How Congress and GOP Leadership Hide Spending From Taxpayers

Opaque Bundling, Hidden Costs, and Accountability Lost Congress claims to serve the public, but the $176.4 billion minibus appropriations pa...