Taxpayer-Funded Absurdity: Uncovering Outrageous Government Spending -From Sex Toys for Kids to Biodiversity in Nepal

 

From Sex Toys for Kids to Biodiversity in Nepal, How Your Money is Being Wasted—and What DOGE is Doing About It

In an era where every tax dollar should count, the federal government’s spending habits often leave Americans scratching their heads—or outright furious. One of the most jaw-dropping examples comes from a recent exposé detailing how a nonprofit, the Center for Innovative Public Health Research (CIPHR), has pocketed over $22 million in government grants since 2016 to educate minors about sex toys while encouraging them to keep it a secret from their parents. Yes, you read that correctly—taxpayer money has been funneled into programs teaching kids as young as 14 about “lube and sex toys” and “increasing pleasure,” all under the guise of “health education.” This revelation, originally published on April 7, 2025, by Hannah Grossman in City Journal (source here), shines a glaring spotlight on the bizarre and often indefensible ways our government allocates funds.

CIPHR’s initiatives, like the “Girl2Girl” program launched in 2017, target teen girls with daily text messages about sexual topics, explicitly advising them to hide their participation from parents if they choose. Another program, “Transcendent Health,” which wrapped up last month with a $1.3 million grant, focused on transgender minors, probing their sexual experiences in focus groups. Critics argue this isn’t just inappropriate—it’s a betrayal of parental trust and a misuse of public resources. The Department of Health and Human Services, which oversees these grants, is now under pressure to cut ties with CIPHR and rethink its funding priorities.

But this isn’t an isolated case of government spending gone wild. Let’s peel back the curtain on a few more outrageous programs that have siphoned off taxpayer dollars:

• $19 Million for Biodiversity in Nepal: While conservation is noble, why are American taxpayers footing the bill for ecological projects halfway across the globe when our own infrastructure crumbles? This grant, highlighted by President Trump in a February 2025 press conference, raises questions about misplaced priorities.
• $42 Million for Social Change in Uganda: Johns Hopkins University received this hefty sum to “drive social and behavior change” abroad. Meanwhile, American schools struggle with outdated facilities and underpaid teachers. Shouldn’t social change start at home?
• $10 Million for Male Circumcision in Mozambique: Funded through a nonprofit contract, this program aimed to curb HIV/AIDS—a worthy goal—but its inclusion in a laundry list of questionable foreign spending has drawn ire. Why not invest that in domestic healthcare instead?

These examples are just the tip of the iceberg. The federal budget, clocking in at $6.8 trillion for the last fiscal year, is a sprawling mess of “zombie programs”—initiatives that linger on despite expired authorizations or dubious value. Enter the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), a task force led by Elon Musk, tasked with slashing waste and fraud. Since its inception via executive order on January 20, 2025, DOGE has been swinging the axe, targeting everything from diversity training grants to redundant research contracts.

As of today, April 10, 2025, DOGE claims savings of $55 billion, though its public “wall of receipts” tallies verifiable cuts at around $8.6 billion—roughly 0.1% of the federal budget. Highlights include $881 million sliced from Education Department contracts, $577 million from “America Last” Labor Department grants, and $49 million from canceled health grants in Kansas. Critics argue the numbers are inflated or lack transparency, but supporters hail it as a start to reining in a bloated bureaucracy. Data analyst Brian Banks’ “Musk Watch DOGE Tracker” pegs confirmed savings at $7.7 billion as of March 25, suggesting the real figure lies somewhere between the hype and the receipts.

The CIPHR scandal, alongside these other head-scratching expenditures, underscores a broader truth: government spending is often less about necessity and more about inertia—or worse, ideology. Parents don’t want their kids secretly texted about sex toys, and taxpayers don’t want their money frittered away on foreign pet projects. DOGE’s mission, while imperfect and polarizing, at least promises a reckoning. Whether it can deliver beyond the headlines remains to be seen, but one thing’s clear: the days of unchecked absurdity might finally be numbered. What do you think—where should the axe fall next?

Disclaimer & Sources, this article reflects sentiment and opinions, not necessarily facts. Sources, links, and views may not represent the author’s personal stance. and nothing in this article should be interpreted as such and or advice, legal advice. You have read the article and by reading the article you came to your own conclusions and used your own thoughts. (Leave a comment) If you spot an error, please contact me promptly to correct it ellenniedz@gmail.com. Rights of logos placed here are for recognition for the blind or eyesight problems on this blog. 😎 You can buy me a coffee here and it's very much appreciated. Thank you.

Image: "Pride" by Photographing Travis is licensed under CC BY 2.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/?