The $176.4 Billion Minibus: How Congress and GOP Leadership Hide Spending From Taxpayers

Opaque Bundling, Hidden Costs, and Accountability Lost

Congress claims to serve the public, but the $176.4 billion minibus appropriations package shows just how far transparency has been abandoned. By bundling multiple bills into one massive spending measure, lawmakers hide the details of taxpayer dollars in plain sight, and leadership led by Speaker Mike Johnson and GOP officials ensures accountability is nearly impossible.

This is not accidental. Bundled bills allow Congress to slip in spending that would never pass on its own, reduce public oversight, and shield political leaders from blame. Standalone appropriations bills, which could be scrutinized line by line, are ignored. The result? Ordinary Americans pay for decisions they cannot see, question, or challenge.

Why This Matters to Taxpayers

A minibus isn’t just bureaucratic; it’s dangerous. Individual programs are approved without debate, amendments are stifled, and controversial spending rides along unnoticed. This is transparency by avoidance, a political tactic that prioritizes expedience and political convenience over public accountability.

The leadership’s reliance on this tactic signals a deliberate strategy: avoid standalone bills that would force them to defend spending choices, while maintaining the appearance of governing competence. Every line of spending buried in the minibus is a line Congress avoids explaining to the American people.

The Consequences Are Real

• Taxpayers cannot track where billions go.

• Lawmakers avoid accountability, voting for packages they haven’t fully read.

• Programs and policies get funded without merit-based debate, including items that might face public opposition.

• The culture of secrecy erodes trust in government, fostering cynicism and disengagement.

Speaker Johnson has previously spoken in favor of single-subject bills, but actions speak louder than words. The continued use of minibus packages is political expediency at the expense of accountability, and the American public is left to foot the bill for decisions made behind closed doors.

Congressional minibus appropriations are bloated, opaque, and anti-democratic. Until lawmakers commit to passing standalone, scrutinized bills, Americans cannot know how their money is being spent, and leadership will continue to dodge responsibility for every controversial dollar.

---

Sources

• House advances minibus package including NSF spending bill - aamc.org

• Omnibus and minibus spending bills reduce transparency and obscure accountability - en.wikipedia.org

• Speaker Mike Johnson’s statements supporting standalone appropriations - foxbaltimore.com

When Bad Data Becomes a Weapon: How Data Broker Misinformation Fuels Workplace Mobbing - Opt-Out.

 

Employees silently suffer as inaccurate records follow them into the workplace, amplifying harassment, bias, and trauma.

Workplace mobbing rarely begins inside a conference room. In many modern cases, it starts far earlier, inside opaque data systems employees never see, cannot access easily, and are powerless to correct in time.

Large employers increasingly rely on third-party data brokers to inform hiring, screening, risk assessments, and internal investigations. LexisNexis Risk Solutions, the largest data broker in the United States under parent company RELX Group, maintains tens of billions of records containing employment history, identity data, family associations, alleged criminal links, and risk indicators. When that information is wrong, the damage does not stay confined to databases. It follows employees directly into the workplace.

Wrong data does not remain neutral. It reshapes how an employee is perceived, treated, and targeted.

From Data Error to Workplace Target

Misinformation inside data broker systems can falsely link an employee to criminal records, deceased individuals, unrelated family members, or fabricated risk profiles. Once such errors flow into employer systems, insurance assessments, compliance reviews, or background screening tools, the employee often becomes marked as “problematic” without explanation.

Colleagues may receive quiet warnings. Supervisors may increase scrutiny. HR may document concerns without sharing underlying sources. Rumors begin to circulate. Isolation follows. Performance is questioned. Opportunities disappear.

What appears externally as “interpersonal conflict” is often coordinated harassment rooted in a false data narrative. Workplace mobbing thrives when misinformation provides perceived justification.

Mobbing Amplified by Presumed Guilt

Workplace mobbing involves persistent harassment, exclusion, sabotage, rumor campaigns, and psychological pressure. Research links mobbing to depression, anxiety, major depressive disorder, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. In clinical samples, more than 70 percent of mobbing victims met diagnostic criteria for PTSD.

When data broker misinformation exists, mobbing escalates faster and becomes harder to challenge. Leadership assumes data equals truth. Employees are forced to defend themselves against invisible accusations. Reporting becomes dangerous when the system already labels the target as high-risk or unreliable.

Presumed guilt replaces due process.

Corporate Convenience, Human Cost

LexisNexis has paid millions of dollars in settlements over inaccurate reporting, including a $13.5 million settlement tied to false “deceased” designations that disrupted employment, insurance, and credit access. Such settlements represent systemic failure, not isolated incidents.

Despite repeated legal actions, federal oversight of data brokers remains minimal. No licensing regime exists. No strict accuracy enforcement exists. No meaningful opt-out exists. Errors are treated as acceptable collateral damage.

For employees, consequences are severe:

• Quiet removal from promotion or leadership tracks

• Heightened surveillance or disciplinary actions

• Psychological injury from sustained mobbing

• Career derailment without formal allegations

• Long-term reputational harm that follows across employers

All while corporations benefit from speed, automation, and plausible deniability.

Organizational Complicity

When employers rely on third-party data without verification, leadership becomes complicit in harm. Silence from management signals endorsement. Policies without transparency provide no protection. HR processes that conceal data sources eliminate any chance of defense.

Organizations that permit mobbing fueled by unverified data transform into systems of psychological injury rather than workplaces of integrity.

Legal risk increases alongside moral failure. Employers inherit liability when data errors drive discriminatory treatment, retaliation, or constructive dismissal.

Protecting Employees in a Data-Driven Workplace

Employees facing mobbing linked to misinformation are not powerless, though the burden is unjustly heavy.

Key protections include:

• Requesting and reviewing personal data held by brokers such as LexisNexis

• Disputing inaccuracies in writing and retaining documentation

• Consulting employment counsel before internal escalation

• Understanding anti-retaliation protections under employment and civil rights laws

• Documenting patterns that demonstrate coordinated harassment

Legal consultation empowers employees without requiring immediate action.

Accountability Must Replace Silence

Bad data does not remain theoretical. It inflicts real psychological trauma, fuels mob stalking dynamics, and destroys livelihoods. Eighty billion records later, data accuracy is no longer a privacy issue alone. It is a workplace safety issue. It is a mental health issue. It is a leadership issue.

Standing up for employees harmed by misinformation requires confronting uncomfortable truths about data brokers, corporate reliance on flawed systems, and institutional silence.

Workers deserve dignity, transparency, and protection from harm generated by invisible databases they never consented to enter.

Silence enables abuse. Accountability restores humanity.

Protect yourself: LexisNexis Opt-Out Form - https://optout.lexisnexis.com

Sources:

Workplace Mobbing: Not a Conspiracy - When Toxic Cultures, Silent Leaders, and Systemic Harm Go Unchallenged

Eighty Billion Records Later: How LexisNexis Turned American Privacy Into Collateral Damage

Workplace Mobbing: Not a Conspiracy - When Toxic Cultures, Silent Leaders, and Systemic Harm Go Unchallenged

 

A Hidden Crisis with Devastating Consequences

Workplace mobbing is not “just bad behavior.” It is a systemic, coordinated form of harassment that can devastate an employee’s psychological, physical, and professional life. Research shows that approximately 20% of workers worldwide experience mobbing, yet about 70% do not report it, leaving the scale of harm deeply underestimated.

The nature of mobbing, persistent harassment, social exclusion, rumor campaigns, sabotage, and psychological pressure, makes it a phenomenon that thrives in silence. Because it is rarely spoken about openly, many companies are permitted to ignore, enable, or even protect perpetrators, turning toxic cultures into sanctuaries of harm rather than workplaces of respect.

---

The Psychological and Health Toll

Workplace mobbing is not a minor stressor; it can induce significant mental health disorders. Research consistently links mobbing with depression, anxiety, and stress‑related conditions.

More strikingly, clinical studies reveal that a high percentage of mobbing victims meet criteria for Post‑Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) a diagnosis traditionally associated with life‑threatening events, yet here emerging from chronic workplace trauma. In one psychiatric sample, over 70% of individuals subjected to mobbing developed PTSD, with many also diagnosed with major depressive disorder.

These findings confirm that mobbing is not normal workplace conflict, it is traumatic exposure with long‑lasting psychological imprinting.

---

The Burden of Disease: Beyond Individual Distress

A recent scoping review aimed at quantifying the broad impact of workplace mobbing found that while standardized measures of disease burden (such as disability‑adjusted life years and quality‑adjusted life years) have not yet been fully applied, the mental health consequences are undeniable. Increased absenteeism, presenteeism (working while impaired), reduced productivity, and higher healthcare utilization are consistently linked with mobbing exposure.

The review also highlights that the economic and social cost of mental illness induced by mobbing remains largely unquantified due to inconsistent definitions and lack of standard measurement frameworks. Nonetheless, indirect indicators show that mobbing significantly burdens employees, employers, and society alike.

---

Toxic Culture, Silent Leadership, and Organizational Complicity

The harm of mobbing is amplified when leadership remains passive or complicit. Leaders who ignore reports, fail to enforce policies, or protect favored employees are not neutral, they are allowing harm to flourish. Toxic organizations effectively become environments where harassment is rewarded through inaction and where victims are left to endure escalating psychological injury.

Silence from supervisors signals acceptance. Policies that exist only on paper provide no real protection. Reporting channels that fear retaliation or dismissal trap employees in cultures that prioritize reputation over well‑being.

When a company allows mobbing to persist:

• Victims’ mental health deteriorates

• Trust in leadership collapses

• Morale declines across teams

• Turnover increases

• Recruitment and retention suffer

Such environments function less like workplaces and more like systems of psychological harm.

---

Why Mobbing Remains Taboo

Despite its pervasive impact, mobbing is seldom discussed outside research circles. There are several reasons for this:

• Victims fear retaliation, career damage, or disbelief

• Reporting rates are low, masking true prevalence and impact

• Organizations worry about reputational risk

• Mobbing may be mislabeled as “bad culture” rather than recognized as systemic harm

This silence protects perpetrators and undermines accountability, allowing toxic companies to operate for years without intervention.

---

Legal Guidance for Employees

If you are experiencing workplace mobbing, remember: you are not alone, and legal frameworks exist to protect you. Here are steps you can take:

1. Document Everything
Keep thorough records of incidents, including dates, descriptions, communications, and names of witnesses. Documentation strengthens your position and establishes patterns of behavior.

2. Understand Legal Protections
In many jurisdictions, hostile work environments, harassment, retaliation, and constructive dismissal are actionable under employment, discrimination, or civil rights laws. Consult your local labor standards and workplace harassment statutes to understand specific protections.

3. Consult an Employment Attorney
An employment attorney can:

• Evaluate whether the behavior rises to legal standards of harassment or hostile work environment

• Advise on reporting channels and anti‑retaliation protections

• Help you prepare administrative complaints or civil actions

• Protect your rights while minimizing retaliation risk

Legal consultation is confidential and does not commit you to immediate action, it empowers you with knowledge and options.

4. Use Internal Reporting Wisely
If safe, report incidents through HR or compliance channels while retaining copies of records and communications. Avoid confrontational disclosures without evidence and attorney guidance.

5. Know Anti‑Retaliation Laws
Many laws prohibit retaliation for reporting harassment or discrimination. Violations of these protections can themselves be legally actionable.

---

Conclusion: Speak Up, Act, Accountability Matters

Workplace mobbing is a serious occupational and public health issue with far‑reaching consequences for mental health, productivity, and human dignity. Despite affecting millions of workers globally, including those who never report it, the true impact remains obscured by silence and stigma.

Victims deserve safe workplaces, ethical leadership, and systems that enforce accountability rather than protect harm. Organizations must acknowledge the reality of mobbing, implement transparent protections, and equip employees and managers with tools to prevent and address coordinated harassment.

Silence sustains harm. Transparency and accountability foster safety.

---

Source Links

• Understanding the Burden of Mental Illness Induced by Workplace Mobbing: A Scoping Review (Actas Españolas de Psiquiatría) — PubMed/PMC: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41117247/

• When Bad Data Becomes a Weapon: How Data Broker Misinformation Fuels Workplace Mobbing - Opt-Out.

• Workplace mobbing causes serious psychiatric trauma including PTSD (Psychosocial Trauma Program study) — PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30911239/

• Workplace bullying and mental health meta‑analysis — PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26305785/

Abuse and Sexual Harassment of Women in the Workforce: A Personal Account and a Call for Accountability

 

A Lived Reality, Not an Abstract Policy

Sexual harassment in the workplace is not a theoretical or abstract issue, it is a lived reality that continues to harm women across industries. It thrives in environments where power is unchecked, accountability is absent, and silence is normalized.

Sharing personal experiences can educate, document, and advocate for systemic change.

---

My Experience

During my employment in a manufacturing setting, I was subjected to repeated and escalating sexual harassment by multiple male coworkers. The conduct was overt, degrading, and intentionally intimidating:

• Sexualized gestures and explicit visual acts

• Public humiliation and demeaning behavior

• Group participation that reinforced and normalized abuse

The harassment was not limited to coworkers. Supervisory personnel failed to intervene, and in some cases, participated in inappropriate behavior. Leadership inaction sent a clear message: misconduct would be tolerated and protected.

As a woman on the production floor, escape was not immediately possible. Reporting felt futile. The psychological impact was severe, constant fear, hypervigilance, and the erosion of professional dignity. No internal safeguards were enforced.

Eventually, remaining became psychologically unbearable. Leaving was not a career choice but a survival decision. The effects persist long after employment ends, consistent with trauma exposure. Sexual harassment does not vanish with resignation; it follows victims into their health, confidence, and professional lives.

---

Workplace Harassment Is a Legal and Ethical Violation

Sexual harassment is not miscommunication, cultural difference, or poor judgment. It is a violation of human dignity and workplace law. Organizations that fail to intervene are complicit, and silent coworkers amplify harm.

Women should not endure degradation to earn a paycheck. Ethical workplaces are defined by action, accountability, and protection of the vulnerable, not statements alone.

---

Legal Guidance for Employees

If you experience or witness sexual harassment, knowing your rights and options is critical:

1. Document Everything:

   • Keep detailed records of incidents, including dates, times, witnesses, and communications.

   • Save emails, messages, photos, or any evidence of harassment.

2. Understand Workplace Protections:

   • Sexual harassment is prohibited under federal and state law, including Title VII of the Civil Rights Act (U.S.) and comparable state protections.

   • Many companies have internal reporting systems, codes of conduct, and HR channels.

3. Seek Legal Counsel:

   • Contact an employment attorney experienced in harassment, discrimination, or hostile work environments.

   • Attorneys provide confidential guidance, assess whether legal thresholds are met, and outline possible remedies.

4. Know Your Rights Against Retaliation:

   • Retaliation for reporting harassment is illegal in many jurisdictions.

   • Legal counsel can advise on protection strategies, including filing complaints with agencies like the EEOC (U.S.) or local labor authorities.

5. Internal Reporting:

   • If safe, report the behavior through HR or compliance channels while retaining evidence.

   • Avoid confrontations without documentation or legal advice.

---

A Call for Accountability

Silence protects abusers. Transparency protects people. Change begins when experiences like mine are acknowledged rather than dismissed.

If abuse is witnessed, it must be challenged.
If harassment is reported, it must be addressed.
If systems fail, they must be reformed.

Women, and all employees deserve workplaces grounded in respect, safety, and accountability, not fear. Ethical leadership and robust safeguards are the foundation of a safe and productive workforce.

---

Closing Thought

Sharing personal experiences is not about sensationalism; it is about truth, awareness, and action. Workplace sexual harassment is preventable, but only when organizations act decisively, leaders are held accountable, and employees know their rights.

https://daretochallengelearn.blogspot.com/2025/12/Workplace-Sexual-Harassement-at-Schwebels-Baking-Co-Solon-Ohio.html

Trauma Bonding in the Workplace: When Nepotism and Bullying Become Systemic

 

Understanding Trauma Bonding at Work

Trauma bonding is often discussed in personal relationships, but it also emerges in professional environments where power imbalances, intimidation, and dependency are consistently reinforced. In workplaces dominated by nepotism and bullying, employees may form trauma bonds that entrench harm rather than foster engagement or loyalty.

Trauma bonding occurs when periods of mistreatment are intermittently interrupted by approval, relief, or perceived safety. In organizations, these cycles often arise when leaders or favored insiders exert control through fear, exclusion, or psychological pressure, followed by brief moments of recognition or reassurance. Employees learn to associate survival, job security, or acceptance with compliance rather than with skill or performance.

---

How Nepotism Amplifies Trauma Bonding

Nepotism intensifies these dynamics. When promotions, protections, or opportunities favor relatives or close associates:

• Rules appear inconsistent

• Accountability becomes selective

• Reporting mechanisms lose credibility

Bullying behaviors, such as public humiliation, gaslighting, retaliation, or social isolation, often go unchecked when perpetrators hold protected status. Non-favored employees face chronic uncertainty, fear of retaliation, and pressure to conform, which reinforces the trauma bond.

---

Psychological and Organizational Consequences

Employees in trauma-bonded workplaces may:

• Internalize blame for mistreatment

• Suppress objections or rationalize abusive conduct

• Remain loyal to organizations that harm them, believing endurance is required for stability or future reward

The broader organizational impact is significant:

• Diminished morale and engagement

• Reduced productivity and creativity

• Higher absenteeism and turnover

• Increased risk of ethical violations going unchallenged

When trauma bonds dominate culture, workplaces prioritize self-preservation over contribution, and leadership remains insulated from accountability.

---

Legal Guidance for Employees

If you find yourself in a trauma-bonded environment, knowing your legal rights can help protect you:

1. Document Everything:

   • Keep detailed records of incidents, dates, times, communications, witnesses, and policy references.

2. Understand Workplace Protections:

   • Many jurisdictions recognize hostile work environments, harassment, retaliation, and discrimination as violations of employment law.

   • Public, private, and unionized workplaces may have internal mechanisms to address misconduct.

3. Seek Legal Counsel:

   • Contact an employment attorney experienced in workplace bullying or harassment.

   • Attorneys can evaluate whether the conduct violates company policy, employment law, or creates a hostile work environment.

   • Consultation is confidential and does not obligate you to take immediate action.

4. Use Internal Channels Wisely:

   • When reporting incidents, use HR or compliance departments while maintaining records of communications.

   • Avoid confrontation alone; let evidence guide your case.

5. Know Your Rights Against Retaliation:

   • Retaliation for reporting bullying or harassment is unlawful in many jurisdictions.

   • Legal counsel can advise on protections and strategies to prevent further harm.

---

Breaking Trauma Bonds Requires Structural Change

Ending trauma bonding is not about individual resilience alone. Sustainable solutions require:

• Transparent governance

• Impartial enforcement of policies

• Independent reporting channels

• Separation of personal relationships from professional authority

• Psychological safety embedded in consistent actions, not symbolic statements

Employees deserve workplaces built on fairness, dignity, and respect. When nepotism and bullying dominate, harm becomes systemic. Awareness, documentation, and collective accountability are critical steps toward restoring integrity and protecting the workforce.

---

Closing Thought

Silence sustains harm. Ethical leadership interrupts it.

Employees, teams, and organizations all benefit when misconduct is addressed consistently, power is exercised responsibly, and professional relationships are grounded in fairness, not fear.

When Supervisors Stay Silent: How Workplace Bullying Damages Companies and Harms Employees

 

Bullying in the workplace rarely survives without permission. That permission is often granted through silence, inaction, or direct participation by supervisors and managers who fail to intervene. When leaders ignore intimidation, isolation, retaliation, psychological pressure, or the misuse of authority, the behavior becomes embedded in the culture rather than treated as a violation.

Supervisors occupy positions of power and influence. When that power is used to silence employees, protect aggressors, or discredit those who raise concerns, the damage multiplies. Silence from leadership sends a clear message: harmful behavior is acceptable, accountability is optional, and speaking up carries risk. In some cases, supervisors actively participate by reinforcing exclusion, spreading narratives, or enabling retaliation, further legitimizing the abuse.

The consequences for the organization are severe and far-reaching. Employee morale deteriorates as trust in leadership collapses. Psychological safety disappears, leading to disengagement, reduced productivity, and increased absenteeism. High performers often leave first, taking institutional knowledge and credibility with them. What remains is a workforce shaped by fear rather than collaboration.

Reputational harm is inevitable. Companies that tolerate or conceal bullying face increased legal exposure, public scrutiny, and long-term brand damage. Word spreads quickly through professional networks, online platforms, and industry circles. An organization known for ignoring misconduct struggles to attract talent, retain clients, or maintain stakeholder confidence.

Bullying also corrodes ethical standards. When supervisors fail to act, policies lose meaning, values become performative, and misconduct escalates. Over time, the organization shifts from one that manages risk to one that creates it.

Leadership carries responsibility, not just authority. Supervisors are obligated to recognize harmful behavior, intervene decisively, document concerns, and protect employees from retaliation. Accountability must be active, visible, and consistent. Respect and dignity are not optional leadership traits; they are operational necessities.

If bullying is observed and ignored, it becomes endorsed.
If supervisors remain silent, they become complicit.

Organizations protect their people, their reputation, and their future only when leadership chooses courage, transparency, and accountability over convenience and silence.

When to Consider Contacting an Employment Attorney

Employees experiencing workplace bullying, mobbing, or supervisory retaliation may benefit from speaking with an employment attorney when internal remedies fail or when leadership is complicit. Legal guidance can help clarify rights, risks, and next steps before harm escalates.

Situations that warrant legal consultation include:

• Bullying or harassment that is persistent, coordinated, or escalating

• Supervisor participation in, encouragement of, or silence around harmful behavior

• Retaliation after reporting concerns to management or HR

• Forced isolation, demotion, excessive scrutiny, or unreasonable workloads

• Pressure to resign, constructive dismissal, or termination following complaints

• Documentation ignored, altered, or dismissed by leadership

An employment attorney can assess whether workplace conduct violates company policy, employment law, or creates a hostile work environment, even when discrimination is not overt.

How Employees Can Prepare Before Reaching Out

Preparation strengthens any legal consultation. Employees are encouraged to:

• Document everything: dates, times, witnesses, emails, messages, performance reviews, and policy references

• Preserve evidence: avoid using work devices exclusively for records when possible

• Review company policies: codes of conduct, anti-retaliation provisions, reporting procedures

• Avoid confrontation: allow facts and records to speak on your behalf

• Seek guidance early: waiting until termination or burnout limits options

What an Employment Attorney Can Provide

Legal counsel can offer:

• Confidential assessment of the situation

• Guidance on whether behavior meets legal thresholds

• Advice on internal escalation versus external action

• Protection strategies against retaliation

• Representation in negotiations, complaints, or legal proceedings

Consultation does not require immediate legal action. It provides clarity, protection, and informed decision-making during a stressful and often isolating experience.

A Final Word to Employees

No employee should be expected to endure psychological harm, isolation, or intimidation to keep their job. When supervisors fail to act or actively contribute to bullying, legal support becomes a necessary safeguard rather than a last resort.

Seeking counsel is not disloyalty. It is self-protection, professionalism, and an assertion of dignity in the face of silence.

The Stalker's Limp: Exposing Retired Navy JAG Timothy M. Sullivan's Predatory Deception, Stalking, and Cover-Up in the Schwebel's Baking Co. Sexual Harassment Hell – From Fake Employee to Abusive Boss

 

Retired Navy JAG Predator Timothy M. Sullivan: The Limping Stalker Who Infiltrated Schwebel's Hellhole, Faked an Injury to Smear Me, Then Hired Me to Continue His Sick Abuse.  A Vile, Demented Creep Shielding Sexual Deviants While Destroying Lives

In my previous exposé, "Now You Know": Naming Names of the Severe Workplace Sexual Harassment at Schwebel's Baking Co., Solon, Ohio," I laid bare the grotesque underbelly of that bakery, a festering pit of sexual predators like Darko, Al, John, and unnamed supervisors who turned dough into weapons of humiliation, thrusting phallic shapes into my hands, parading erections, and masturbatory gestures in a relentless campaign to break me. From 2014 to March 2015, Schwebel's was no workplace; it was a den of evil where men, treated me like prey, blaming me for every mishap as if I were some cursed "Exorcist" figure.
Leadership did nothing, allowing the rot to spread. But that was just the surface. Now, with fresh revelations, I drag into the light the slimy thread connecting it all: Retired Navy JAG Attorney Timothy M. Sullivan, whose involvement wasn't just a cover-up – it was active participation in the torment, morphing into outright stalking and further abuse.
Let's name this predator outright: Timothy M. Sullivan, the so-called "Retired Navy JAG" operating out of Westlake, Ohio, through his Law Offices of Timothy M. Sullivan and the affiliated HS Financial Group. This man didn't just help Schwebel's bury the harassment; he infiltrated it. He slithered into the bakery disguised as a "fake nerd employee," pretending to be some innocuous worker. Who knows what his real game was, spying, intimidating, or just getting off on the chaos? The very next day after his appearance, whispers spread like wildfire: EMS had to be called because he'd suffered a "hip injury." And guess who got blamed? Me. 
The small-minded jack-offs at Schwebel's, dildo doughs and sporting hard-ons like badges of honor painted me as the villain, the "Exorcist" whose mere presence cursed him. Around the same time, rumors flew about a Black girl's finger being severed in some accident, and again, fingers pointed at me. I don't know if her finger was truly cut off, but in that twisted hellhole, truth didn't matter. The place was loaded with demented souls, men who preyed sexually, women who believed proximity to me invited evil. It was pure insanity, a cult of sickness where harassment wasn't just tolerated; it was ritual.
But Sullivan's depravity didn't end at Schwebel's. Two years later, this creep stalked me right into his own lair. He hired me at HS Financial Group (aka the Law Offices of Timothy M. Sullivan) in Westlake, Ohio, a move that reeks of obsession. I was abused there too, trapped in another cycle of torment under his roof. The realization hit like a gut punch one day as I sat in my car outside the office. Out he walks, locks eyes with me, and starts limping exaggeratedly,  a smug, smart-ass "ah ha, it's me" taunt. That limp? Straight from the Schwebel's "injury" he'd pinned on me. He's as sick and twisted as Darko with his dough penis or the supervisor forcing wiener shapes into my palm. Sullivan didn't just cover for those predators; he emulated them, turning his professional facade into a tool for personal vendetta.
These men, Sullivan, Darko, Al, John, the unnamed supervisors, and the stand-in CEO who gestured crudely in my face, have skated free for years, their actions shielded by silence and power. Sullivan's firm, masquerading as a legitimate collection agency and law office , hides behind a veneer of respectability, but peel it back, and you'll find the same rot that infested Schwebel's. 
As a retired Navy JAG, he should embody justice, yet he weaponized his position to protect harassers and extend my nightmare. I've suffered irreparable damage: PTSD that chains me in fear, isolation that echoes the loneliness of those bakery shifts, and a shattered trust in humanity. My life derailed because of their unchecked evil.
This isn't just my story anymore, it's a demand for justice served on a platter. Expose them. Hold Sullivan accountable for his deception, stalking, and abuse. Drag Schwebel's and HS Financial Group into the spotlight until they crumble under the weight of their sins. If you've endured similar horrors, speak out. These predators thrive in shadows; let's flood them with light. No more cover-ups. No more limps and lies. I want Justice now!
Barbara Niedzalkowski
December 19, 2025

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx