Thursday, January 15, 2026

Eighty Billion Records Later: How LexisNexis Turned American Privacy Into Collateral Damage

 

wikipedia - LexisNexis



How America’s Largest Data Broker Profits From Inaccuracy, Political Influence, and Regulatory Failure While Consumers Absorb the Damage






In 2021, a warning went out to consumers: personal data had become a commodity, traded at industrial scale, with ordinary Americans bearing all the risk and none of the control. Four years later, conditions have deteriorated. The scale has grown, the errors persist, and accountability remains elusive. The largest data broker in the country, LexisNexis Risk Solutions, operating under its parent company RELX Group, continues to warehouse, monetize, and distribute deeply sensitive personal information on millions of people, often inaccurately, often without consent, and frequently with documented harm.

The core issue has never changed. Consumers are exposed to serious risk by data brokers, and no meaningful federal protection exists to stop it.

The Reality of Data Brokerage in America

LexisNexis maintains and sells access to databases containing tens of billions of records. Those records include names, addresses, Social Security numbers, employment history, family associations, financial indicators, and alleged criminal links. Errors inside those systems are not rare anomalies. Misidentification is routine.

Consumers have been falsely labeled as deceased. Law-abiding citizens have been associated with criminal records belonging to strangers. Living individuals have been linked to dead relatives or people who never shared any family relationship at all. In some cases, Social Security numbers have been entered incorrectly, causing records to merge across unrelated individuals. Once those errors propagate through insurance systems, law enforcement tools, financial institutions, and background checks, damage follows quickly and quietly.

A consumer rarely receives notice. Correction processes are opaque, slow, and burdensome. Harm occurs long before any fix arrives, if one arrives at all.

Law Enforcement Databases and Presumed Guilt

LexisNexis Accurint products are widely marketed to law enforcement agencies. When inaccurate data enters those systems, innocent people can be flagged alongside criminals, suspects, or deceased individuals. The consequence is severe: investigatory bias, denial of services, surveillance, or worse.

A striking example emerged in New Jersey. Approximately 18,000 law enforcement personnel filed a class action lawsuit against LexisNexis Risk Data Management, alleging improper data practices, privacy violations, and retaliation. Proceedings remain ongoing, underscoring a broader truth: even trained professionals inside the system struggle to protect their own data from misuse.

If law enforcement officers face such exposure, consumers stand virtually defenseless.

Settlements as Evidence of Systemic Failure

LexisNexis has paid millions of dollars over more than a decade to resolve lawsuits tied to inaccurate reporting and consumer harm. One prominent case resulted in a $13.5 million settlement over false “deceased” designations that disrupted lives, credit access, insurance, and employment. Separate Fair Credit Reporting Act cases produced additional payouts.

Settlements of that magnitude do not signal isolated mistakes. They represent repeat failures embedded in business operations. Financial penalties have become a cost of doing business rather than a catalyst for reform.

Meanwhile, federal consumer protection authorities in the United States have failed to impose comprehensive oversight on data brokers. No licensing regime exists. No strict accuracy mandates exist. No universal opt-out exists. No meaningful penalties exist that threaten business continuity.

The evidence is clear: millions paid in settlements over many years, yet the same harms continue.

Political Influence and Regulatory Silence

RELX Group, the parent company of LexisNexis, has made political contributions since 1996, predominantly to Democratic candidates, while maintaining contributions to Republicans sufficient to preserve bipartisan access. During recent election cycles, contributions exceeded hundreds of thousands to more than one million dollars per cycle. Political organizations also paid over $5.1 million in the 2024 cycle alone to LexisNexis for data, analytics, donor research, and political intelligence services.

At the same time, LexisNexis actively promotes political research tools to campaigns, advocacy groups, and policymakers.

Regulatory inaction exists alongside that influence. Despite widespread documentation of harm, no aggressive federal consumer privacy regime has emerged to restrain data brokers. State-level efforts remain fragmented, and even those face legislative pressure to weaken enforcement mechanisms.

A reasonable observer could conclude that consumer privacy has been deprioritized in favor of political convenience and corporate profitability.

The Consumer Pays the Price

For consumers, consequences are tangible and personal:

  • Denied insurance coverage

  • Incorrect risk scoring

  • Employment background check failures

  • Credit disruptions

  • Law enforcement scrutiny

  • Identity confusion that takes years to correct

All without consent. All without compensation. All while data brokers profit.

Data brokerage in America operates on a presumption of guilt, not innocence. Once data enters the system, the burden shifts entirely to the individual to prove errors, navigate bureaucracy, and repair damage caused by private corporations operating beyond meaningful oversight.

A Call for Public Awareness and Reform

Protection will not arrive quietly. Awareness must precede accountability. Consumers must understand how personal data is collected, sold, and weaponized against them. Legislators must confront the structural failures allowing data brokers to operate with near immunity. Regulatory agencies must treat repeated settlements as proof of systemic abuse, not minor compliance lapses.

Eighty billion records later, the harm is no longer theoretical. The question is no longer whether consumers are at risk. The question is how long public institutions will tolerate an industry built on unchecked surveillance, error tolerance, and profit extracted from personal vulnerability.

Side note: I have not made 1 dime off of the demise of Americans. Telling the truth doesn't make you prosper, telling the truth gets those in Authority to silence you, even if it badly affects millions of Americans, those in power silence the truth tellers so you are not aware of the harm that can happen or did happen!

Sources and References

at No comments:
Labels: , , , , ,

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Workplace Mobbing: Not a Conspiracy - When Toxic Cultures, Silent Leaders, and Systemic Harm Go Unchallenged

 


A Hidden Crisis with Devastating Consequences

Workplace mobbing is not “just bad behavior.” It is a systemic, coordinated form of harassment that can devastate an employee’s psychological, physical, and professional life. Research shows that approximately 20% of workers worldwide experience mobbing, yet about 70% do not report it, leaving the scale of harm deeply underestimated.

The nature of mobbing, persistent harassment, social exclusion, rumor campaigns, sabotage, and psychological pressure, makes it a phenomenon that thrives in silence. Because it is rarely spoken about openly, many companies are permitted to ignore, enable, or even protect perpetrators, turning toxic cultures into sanctuaries of harm rather than workplaces of respect.

The Psychological and Health Toll

Workplace mobbing is not a minor stressor; it can induce significant mental health disorders. Research consistently links mobbing with depression, anxiety, and stress‑related conditions.

More strikingly, clinical studies reveal that a high percentage of mobbing victims meet criteria for Post‑Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) a diagnosis traditionally associated with life‑threatening events, yet here emerging from chronic workplace trauma. In one psychiatric sample, over 70% of individuals subjected to mobbing developed PTSD, with many also diagnosed with major depressive disorder.

These findings confirm that mobbing is not normal workplace conflict, it is traumatic exposure with long‑lasting psychological imprinting.

The Burden of Disease: Beyond Individual Distress

A recent scoping review aimed at quantifying the broad impact of workplace mobbing found that while standardized measures of disease burden (such as disability‑adjusted life years and quality‑adjusted life years) have not yet been fully applied, the mental health consequences are undeniable. Increased absenteeism, presenteeism (working while impaired), reduced productivity, and higher healthcare utilization are consistently linked with mobbing exposure.

The review also highlights that the economic and social cost of mental illness induced by mobbing remains largely unquantified due to inconsistent definitions and lack of standard measurement frameworks. Nonetheless, indirect indicators show that mobbing significantly burdens employees, employers, and society alike.

Toxic Culture, Silent Leadership, and Organizational Complicity

The harm of mobbing is amplified when leadership remains passive or complicit. Leaders who ignore reports, fail to enforce policies, or protect favored employees are not neutral, they are allowing harm to flourish. Toxic organizations effectively become environments where harassment is rewarded through inaction and where victims are left to endure escalating psychological injury.

Silence from supervisors signals acceptance. Policies that exist only on paper provide no real protection. Reporting channels that fear retaliation or dismissal trap employees in cultures that prioritize reputation over well‑being.

When a company allows mobbing to persist:

  • Victims’ mental health deteriorates

  • Trust in leadership collapses

  • Morale declines across teams

  • Turnover increases

  • Recruitment and retention suffer

Such environments function less like workplaces and more like systems of psychological harm.

Why Mobbing Remains Taboo

Despite its pervasive impact, mobbing is seldom discussed outside research circles. There are several reasons for this:

  • Victims fear retaliation, career damage, or disbelief

  • Reporting rates are low, masking true prevalence and impact

  • Organizations worry about reputational risk

  • Mobbing may be mislabeled as “bad culture” rather than recognized as systemic harm

This silence protects perpetrators and undermines accountability, allowing toxic companies to operate for years without intervention.

Legal Guidance for Employees

If you are experiencing workplace mobbing, remember: you are not alone, and legal frameworks exist to protect you. Here are steps you can take:

1. Document Everything
Keep thorough records of incidents, including dates, descriptions, communications, and names of witnesses. Documentation strengthens your position and establishes patterns of behavior.

2. Understand Legal Protections
In many jurisdictions, hostile work environments, harassment, retaliation, and constructive dismissal are actionable under employment, discrimination, or civil rights laws. Consult your local labor standards and workplace harassment statutes to understand specific protections.

3. Consult an Employment Attorney
An employment attorney can:

  • Evaluate whether the behavior rises to legal standards of harassment or hostile work environment

  • Advise on reporting channels and anti‑retaliation protections

  • Help you prepare administrative complaints or civil actions

  • Protect your rights while minimizing retaliation risk

Legal consultation is confidential and does not commit you to immediate action, it empowers you with knowledge and options.

4. Use Internal Reporting Wisely
If safe, report incidents through HR or compliance channels while retaining copies of records and communications. Avoid confrontational disclosures without evidence and attorney guidance.

5. Know Anti‑Retaliation Laws
Many laws prohibit retaliation for reporting harassment or discrimination. Violations of these protections can themselves be legally actionable.

Conclusion: Speak Up, Act, Accountability Matters

Workplace mobbing is a serious occupational and public health issue with far‑reaching consequences for mental health, productivity, and human dignity. Despite affecting millions of workers globally, including those who never report it, the true impact remains obscured by silence and stigma.

Victims deserve safe workplaces, ethical leadership, and systems that enforce accountability rather than protect harm. Organizations must acknowledge the reality of mobbing, implement transparent protections, and equip employees and managers with tools to prevent and address coordinated harassment.

Silence sustains harm. Transparency and accountability foster safety.

Source Links




at No comments:
Labels: , , , , , ,
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

New

The $176.4 Billion Minibus: How Congress and GOP Leadership Hide Spending From Taxpayers

Opaque Bundling, Hidden Costs, and Accountability Lost Congress claims to serve the public, but the $176.4 billion minibus appropriations pa...